avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

Not to mention calling for her to be fired!! That’s loss of income!! She should get herself a good lawyer and sue the crap out of him

sep 2, 2025, 5:22 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Timothy Schwarzauer @schwatd.bsky.social

You have a First Amendment right to call for anyone to be fired.

sep 2, 2025, 5:26 pm • 10 0 • view
avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

And you have the right to sue

sep 2, 2025, 5:27 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Timothy Schwarzauer @schwatd.bsky.social

You have a right to pay the fee and file a lawsuit, yes. But if the lawsuit is a SLAPP suit, ie you're suing over constitutionaly protected speech, then you could end up owing the person you sued a large sum of money.

sep 2, 2025, 5:28 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Enrique Bedlam @enriquebedlam.bsky.social

Sure. And if you don't present prima facie evidence of all the elements of the tort you can be sanctioned or held to an Anti-Slapp law if you live somewhere with one.

sep 2, 2025, 5:28 pm • 9 0 • view
avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

Sorry guys, she had every right to sue Trump for calling her dumb asked for her firing at ABC

sep 2, 2025, 5:30 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Timothy Schwarzauer @schwatd.bsky.social

No, friend. That would be a SLAPP suit and would result in her owing substantial amounts of money if she sued over these comments.

sep 2, 2025, 5:30 pm • 10 0 • view
avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

Yet this is ok. Got it! www.newsweek.com/trump-abc-ne...

sep 2, 2025, 5:33 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Timothy Schwarzauer @schwatd.bsky.social

Again, you're confusing your own morality for the law. If you weren't so attached to your own bigotry, you might actually learn something about the law.

sep 2, 2025, 5:35 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Enrique Bedlam @enriquebedlam.bsky.social

Yup. And that demand has no legal basis. It was a settlement. The only thing the court found is that it was improper to dismiss because it could be potentially proven ABC had defamed him.

sep 2, 2025, 5:35 pm • 9 0 • view
avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

Donna has every right to go after Trump

sep 2, 2025, 5:36 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Timothy Schwarzauer @schwatd.bsky.social

No, friend. She would just end up owing money. It's the same reason why Trump can't sue me for saying he is a moron and should be in prison.

sep 2, 2025, 5:37 pm • 11 0 • view
avatar
Timothy Schwarzauer @schwatd.bsky.social

Why do you want to give Trump the power to sue people who say he is an idiot?

sep 2, 2025, 5:39 pm • 8 0 • view
avatar
Denys Beecher @dbeecher.bsky.social

She has every right to go after you or me too. You can always file a suit. There just wouldn't be any point in doing it

sep 2, 2025, 5:44 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

Absolutely! If I have personal-distress or lose my job? Yes

sep 2, 2025, 5:47 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Enrique Bedlam @enriquebedlam.bsky.social

Again. Clifford v Trump or Trump V Clinton et all for how that would go.

sep 2, 2025, 5:38 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Enrique Bedlam @enriquebedlam.bsky.social

I mean sure. She has the right. And if her lawyers lie to the court and say they had cause to file the suit the court has every right to force her to buy Pam Bondi a yacht.

sep 2, 2025, 5:31 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

Well, your boy Trump wants more money from ABC for Donna’s comments. I guess that is ok

sep 2, 2025, 5:33 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Timothy Schwarzauer @schwatd.bsky.social

You're confusing your morality for the law. If you weren't so attached to your own bigotry, you might learn something from legal professionals in the field of law.

sep 2, 2025, 5:33 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

I’m not. I’m seeing an unfair justice system.

sep 2, 2025, 5:34 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Timothy Schwarzauer @schwatd.bsky.social

The system is what protects you from being sued for your comments about Trump.

sep 2, 2025, 5:35 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Enrique Bedlam @enriquebedlam.bsky.social

It's not unfair. It makes a lot of sense if you know how it works. More then happy to help you with it if you like?

sep 2, 2025, 5:37 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

I absolutely understand how it works. Wish you would do a little more research

sep 2, 2025, 5:39 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Enrique Bedlam @enriquebedlam.bsky.social

You are reeeeeallly into the element of damages. One of 4 elements for defamation. Do you have any evidence for the other 3? Because going in there with just damages is going to lead to her owing Trump money.

sep 2, 2025, 5:24 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Rob @billsbackerboston.bsky.social

Not if she gets fired or gets death threats. I mean, how much did Rudy have to pay? How much did ABC have to pay to Trump? Judge even said he raped her! www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...

sep 2, 2025, 5:27 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Timothy Schwarzauer @schwatd.bsky.social

Rudy defaulted. It isn't relevant to this case as these aren't precedential matters. What is the falsifiable statement of fact?

sep 2, 2025, 5:30 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Enrique Bedlam @enriquebedlam.bsky.social

Rudy chose to default on his case. ABC settled after it was found that their specific statement could be proven false and wasn't covered by substantial truth doctrine. None of that is at play here. For a better example of how this case would go, see Clifford v Trump or Trump vs Clinton et all.

sep 2, 2025, 5:30 pm • 2 0 • view