avatar
Marwood @andmarwood.bsky.social

Maybe look at the whole thread? i.e. the bit about Starmer?

aug 31, 2025, 10:09 am • 1 0

Replies

avatar
Dan the Sweary @superpylon.bsky.social

Why? It doesn't change the absurdity of the thing I'm mocking.

aug 31, 2025, 10:11 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dan the Sweary @superpylon.bsky.social

Okay I did, and it changed nothing. Whining someone didn't apologise to the monarch is as hilarious as it is ridiculous.

aug 31, 2025, 10:12 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Marwood @andmarwood.bsky.social

aug 31, 2025, 10:19 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Dan the Sweary @superpylon.bsky.social

The point has not gone over my head the issue of unlawfully dissolving parliament to push through dreadful policy is a serious issue. Not apologising to the monarch for doing it is not. If anything the population deserved an apology.

aug 31, 2025, 10:27 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Nelly Probin @lillmagill.bsky.social

The use of SI's to push through changes to legislation without Parliamentary scrutiny is being abused by this and previous governments. They are taking their use well beyond the original purpose. I think that's the more important issue here. But the thread comes as a package, Bozo 'n all.

aug 31, 2025, 10:33 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Dan the Sweary @superpylon.bsky.social

Yeah I get all that, I'm still allowed to be amused by the people that are upset the monarch didn't get an apology.

aug 31, 2025, 10:36 am • 0 0 • view