avatar
Emily Rae @ecrmaths.bsky.social

Argh, I wish you hadn't pointed that out 🙈

jul 25, 2025, 11:29 am • 2 0

Replies

avatar
Tim Corica @tcorica.bsky.social

Also, it appears to have left off the horizontal axis label ("hours") and moved the horizontal axis values from the middle of the gridlines to fall directly under each gridline.

jul 25, 2025, 11:39 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
W. Ethan Duckworth @weduckworth.bsky.social

Humans for the win.

jul 25, 2025, 11:47 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Emily Rae @ecrmaths.bsky.social

Totally agree (but this human couldn't be bothered to faff about creating some axes for what is really just one question of about 20 in a support booklet!)

jul 25, 2025, 11:53 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Emily Rae @ecrmaths.bsky.social

It's actually added the label "hours" itself, which was missing from the original graph. I asked it to change it, as it should really be "days"

jul 25, 2025, 11:52 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
richardtrimble.bsky.social @richardtrimble.bsky.social

Sorry! AI has learned all our bad habits...

jul 25, 2025, 11:59 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
The Maths Bazaar @themathsbazaar.bsky.social

It has put the numbers under the lines, rather than under the spaces. But as it’s a bar chart, there should be gaps between the bars anyway as it is a discrete distribution. I suppose you could turn it into a vertical line chart.

jul 25, 2025, 12:38 pm • 2 0 • view