That was not what i meant of course they had plotholes noone denies that but they wernt written to provide context to the movies or Shows unlike a lot of disney sw books which in itself is a sideeffect of how limiting their "Canon" is on books specificlly
All of them provide context to the movies or use them as a basis. That's how it's always worked
The darth bane trilogy? All of the old republic books? The new jedi order series? Non of those are even remotly related to the movies
Are you kidding me with the bane trilogy? Rule of two directly relates to the movies... it's stated in episode 1 which came before bane came out. New jedi order has the big three from the OT in it.. the only one you have a case for is old republic but even that relies on the films as well
They are set in the same universe and still follow the skywalkers/solos after endor so yes they have the same characters its the continuation of their story i hope so It still tells galaxy changing storys NJO specificly in disney only on screen can the galaxy change
Except in you know the high republic era books... I swear it's like you all forget that Disney has 15 almost 16 years of content.
Case in point I'm reading the legacy of the force series and it has many direct references to Boba Fett working for Vader which was provides context to why he was in empire strikes back and how he survived the events of return... stop it.
What? Legacy is set like 50 years after the movies? More?
And it has the big 3 in it... and direct references to the movies as well
And it still tells a unique story thats not just used to fill some plotholes
Go read an actual Disney book before you comment again... they have a ton of unique stuff in the high republic series. Stop it.