avatar
Mike Hinford @mikehinford.bsky.social

I recognise the name Hypx from twitter. One of the people that thinks "hydrogen is the future for cars". Just because you can fill it up faster than you can charge. It's definitely not the future for cars!

aug 1, 2025, 11:18 pm • 1 0

Replies

avatar
bettertimes.bsky.social @bettertimes.bsky.social

No idea what they are talking about anyway or why they have entered a debate about wood burning!

aug 2, 2025, 9:35 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Hypx @hypx.bsky.social

The conversation is a repeat of the solar power debate. Naysayers were convinced that it could not work out, and even brought out "laws of physics" as a major reason. But then solar got cheap and those arguments turned out to be unserious nonsense arguments. Hydrogen will be a repeat of that.

aug 2, 2025, 1:45 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
bettertimes.bsky.social @bettertimes.bsky.social

What has this got to do with a discussion on wood burning stoves?

aug 2, 2025, 9:36 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Charnwood @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social

The point is that taking an absolutist position like banning all burning doesn't help improvements and progress. All energy sources have pros and cons-including hydrogen and wood burning, we have a responsibility to innovate to maximise the +ves and minimise the -ves.

aug 2, 2025, 2:24 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bettertimes.bsky.social @bettertimes.bsky.social

Wood burning has no cons at all! What needs to be banned are: wood burning stoves and open fires; bonfires; and fire pits. Not one of these is necessary and all emit toxic fumes that are a danger to health. Those not able to switch to another form of heating should be helped with a grant.

aug 2, 2025, 3:29 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Charnwood @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social

Glad you don't see any cons in wood burning! You are right it is mostly it is pros (encouraging forestry, biodiversity, supporting local economy and well-being benefits). We are trying to ensure that any emissions are minimised so everyone can enjoy the benefits of good wood burning without -ves.

aug 2, 2025, 4:27 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bettertimes.bsky.social @bettertimes.bsky.social

You are so good at spin! We can all see through it though! 😉

aug 3, 2025, 9:54 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Charnwood @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social

Hopefully we are even better at making great stoves 😬

aug 3, 2025, 3:48 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bettertimes.bsky.social @bettertimes.bsky.social

No just spinning the facts!

aug 4, 2025, 8:54 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mike Hinford @mikehinford.bsky.social

Definitely not! What you are great at, is cherry picking data, and never comparing modern stoves to gas boilers and heat pumps. It's like you care about money more than people's health. You are great at that too.

aug 3, 2025, 5:03 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Mike Hinford @mikehinford.bsky.social

You don't recognise sarcasm then?

aug 2, 2025, 4:43 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
bettertimes.bsky.social @bettertimes.bsky.social

It was too subtle for them! Forgot to spell out exactly what I meant. My bad! 🤪

aug 3, 2025, 9:56 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Charnwood @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social

😉

aug 2, 2025, 4:51 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Neighbours Against Wood Smoke @nbrsvswoodsmoke.bsky.social

All burning doesn't need to be banned. Just the highly polluting types. Neighbours need H&S protections like we have for gas boilers, yet the emissions from these are tiny in comparison to wood stoves. This is a legal loophole that has gone under the radar until recently. Now we need action.

aug 2, 2025, 3:39 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mike Hinford @mikehinford.bsky.social

As I said earlier I don't want to ban all burning. Banning wood burning stoves would definitely give environmental improvements for health and the planet. Renewables and heat pumps would help even more. Tidal and Geothermal energy would provide a good baseload for electricity generation.

aug 2, 2025, 2:25 pm • 1 0 • view