I don't see a way to respond to your additional points re: not agreeing with looking at drop-off rates, etc. Perhaps that's on purpose. Doesn't seem like a genuine attempt to discuss the issue. tsk tsk
Replies
YOU. not anybody else added several claims to the thread Focus
sep 3, 2025, 4:42 am • 0 0 • view
Because there is cumulative evidence. ETA was sharing information as they uncovered it and sifted through it. You want to focus on one thing and pick it to death with exhausting disinformation of your own. This started because the US President publicly said...Musk...voting counting computers...
sep 3, 2025, 12:58 pm • 0 0 • view
I have already pointed out the flaw in your approach, trying it under a different name is not effective. Gish Gallop: Overwhelms with many weak arguments so they can't all be addressed. Fallacy of Composition: Assumes that combining weak evidence makes a strong case. 1/
sep 3, 2025, 1:22 pm • 1 0 • view
I look at each claim individually. There is no cumulative effect of unrelated false claims. They start with a conclusion and throw different claims to support the conclusion they want to reach. 2/
sep 3, 2025, 1:24 pm • 0 0 • view
volume is not virtue. Even if each piece of evidence seems plausible, collectively they don’t necessarily add up to a robust argument—especially if each hasn’t been critically examined on its own merits. 3/3
sep 3, 2025, 1:24 pm • 0 0 • view