One thing that's not being covered abt scam Trump defense attorney Todd Blanche is conducting: Having reviewed the Epstein files and put together a list of the prominent people in them, THEN CULLED THEM of Trump and people Trump wants to protect, Blanche just questioning Maxwell of a list of names.
The people should be reviewing the entire file, not attorneys. It should be published online and free to view. Victims names redacted, of course.
Creating a client list with info? Just wait conspiracy people then pivot to something else they need.
That is the way it is going to go down. HOWEVER we still have Maureen Comey, the lead prosecutor on both Ghislain and Epstein's prosecution who knows it all. So be careful Blanche, be careful, others know what is in the files.
Maureen Comey needs some big protection dogs and armed security around the clock. NYS should provide her US VP-level police protection around the clock.
Not interviewing... negotiating what she has to sign her name to
Mark my words: The FIC is dangling the US AG job over Todd's head for him to deliver a "he did nothing wrong" narrative from Maxwell. If he gets that, Bondi will be out the door (or reassigned) so fast, she'll be dizzier than we already know her to be.
Just another use of the kompromat that Epstein created. Now Trump controls the list.
Do we have any information that answers your question of who, if anyone, was present other than Blanche, Markus and Maxwell?
The repeated trauma these women are facing breaks my heart and soul
Oh the fix is in… big time. Fortunately we got what we needed from NOAA acoustic sensor data in the NE Caribbean Sea
Uh... What? 🤔
You sure you wanna know? bsky.app/profile/jack...
Okay, I see the implication. And I'm certain that Epstein was a #kompromat factory. However, I doubt NOAA sensors would detect a body (or another package) hitting the water unless the mass was extremely large. How many whales break the surface in the Caribbean every minute? Are they all recorded?
We’re listening for near-silent subs… They hear *everything*
I'm curious about your premise, and will look into this a bit later. I also don't doubt that Drumpf/Epstein are/were capable of 'disappearing' persons that are inconvenient to them. However, I generally ascribe to the Carl Sagan quote that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."...
That Sagan quote is genuine horseshit. Any claim worth investigating need but preponderance of the evidence to be taken seriously. And the evidence is out there… if you know who has it.
A body, especially a younger child, impacting the sea is likely indistinguishable from a whale splashing on the surface. If direct correlation could be attributed to flight paths, speeds, altitudes of the "Lolita Express" and such impacts... then I would have to admit the possibility exists.
Homie… a whale breaching will be heard moving through the ocean. A foreign object entering the water from altitude is acoustically aberrant—I assure you.
(Irrespective of size)
1/x This is going to be lengthy and detailed, but fair. And, I've given you the benefit of the doubt throughout. So here we go...
Exactly. You assume that the human strikes the surface FAR AWAY from any moving whales, in isolation. A whale nearby would provide acoustic cover, not contradict the sound of a human impact.
…. Wut?
Also, you said: "A foreign object entering the water from altitude is acoustically aberrant—I assure you." Assurances aside, can you demonstrate this with evidence?
I wouldn’t be so sure. Imagine what they are *not* writing openly on their website. After all, NOAA is a military agency. Keyword would be monitoring of acoustical signatures. And this is hugely enhanced for decades through machine learning. oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/technology/a...
bsky.app/profile/jack... It’s not up to the humans atp.
Oh he also indicated his absolute trepidation to approve DEW systems 👀
It’s sad, he’s dying of cancer now. Probably totally unrelated.
Wonder if Melania or Paolo Zampolli (model agency owner, Trump employee, and US Special Envoy under Trump) were on that list?
That is Trump's extortion list.
But DJT will have additional leverage over those guys on the list because he can not only shame them, he can shake them down with a credible threat of prosecution by his DOJ. DJT to Guys on this List: “Who’s your Daddy now…” (probably).
No client list? But asked about 100 names...
Assuming Ghislaine receives a pardon, is she liable for any state crimes in NY or CA? (I assume she could murder 100 people in Florida, and they would make her AG.) And if so, could such cases be prepared now?
As far as I know no career prosecutor who previously worked on this case was part of these interviews; one was fired. So, are these interviews conducted because it’s in the interest of all the people or is it conducted in the interest of just a few people?
Plenty of opportunities for extortion too, either now or further down the line… Anybody whose power, money or influence Trump fancied a piece of…
www.slideshare.net/slideshow/ka... I’m sure they are reviewing this as well
Yep and he’s bribing everyone else
Because when you're panicking, the brain cannot effectively strategize.
they not doing a great job of strategizing when they're *not* panicking
The world is watching this corrupt administration. It is beyond belief but it keeps happening.
Blanche's appointment to DOJ covers 2 bases. Reward and protection. No?
She will go further and also exonerate Trump.