SCOTUS now being asked to take up this case and strike down large-capacity magazine bans nationwide www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
SCOTUS now being asked to take up this case and strike down large-capacity magazine bans nationwide www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
How are they able to argue that the ban prohibits firearm ownership/carry? They can be mutually exclusive...
wwhhHHYYYYY
How can ANYONE think that more bullets in guns is a good thing? A hunter should need only ONE bullet at a time.
Having magazines that hold more than 10 rounds might come in handy for opposing the forces of a tyrannical government. Have you been paying attention to Trump’s proposal to send troops into major cities? The Second Amendment isn’t about hunting.
The 2Am is about well-regulated militias, such as the National Guard, not some guys in the neighborhood -- and it was written when the US did not want a standing army at all. Republicans own most of the guns. They are on the Order side of the political continuum, which ends in fascism.
No, it is a “right of the people.” Trump’s use of the National Guard shows exactly why your interpretation would offer no protection against a tyrannical government (which is what the people who wrote it were worried about).
Most of the Americans who own guns SUPPORT tyranny.
Corrupt to the core.