Liz Dye • Feed
avatar
Liz Dye @lizdye.bsky.social

Let me take a big swig of Diet Coke and crack open Twitter's trollsuit against Apple and OpenAI ... OWWW MY NOSE BURNS storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS A. The Rise of AI: From Turing to Billions 33. Can machines think? Within a century after Alan Turing, the recognized father of artificial intelligence, first asked that question, machines are not only thinking; they are thinking for us faster than we ever could. AI could beat its programmer at checkers by 1959, engage in conversation by 1966 (ELIZA), defeat the world’s reigning chess champion by 1997 (IBM Deep Blue), and topple former Jeopardy! champions by 2011 (IBM Watson). 34. ELIZA was the world’s first chatbot—i.e., AI that can simulate human conversation. While ELIZA could simulate a conversation with a psychotherapist, it used keyword recognition to produce replies to questions from a set of predefined scripts and could not produce new responses outside that set of scripts. 35. Unlike ELIZA, generative AI chatbots today can generate new content in response to a user’s prompt (i.e., a user question or request) and are not limited to answers from a predefined set of information. For example, if a user were discussing Shakespeare but suddenly pivoted to talking about lunch, a generative AI chatbot would be able to keep up with that drastic change in topic, while a non-generative AI chatbot would be limited to preexisting topics and keywords it had access to, breaking the natural flow of the conversation.
sep 1, 2025, 4:13 pm • 95 19

Replies

avatar
ftp-coward.bsky.social @ftp-coward.bsky.social

So assume they had Grok draft this complaint then?

sep 1, 2025, 4:16 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
The Infinitely Prolonged @wowbaggert.bsky.social

lol A TALE OF TWO MONOPOLISTS. It was the best of suits, it was the worst of suits...

sep 1, 2025, 4:16 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
The Infinitely Prolonged @wowbaggert.bsky.social

Rooting for injuries.

sep 1, 2025, 4:14 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
stephenmj.bsky.social @stephenmj.bsky.social

unfortunately "factual" is an incredibly imprecise term, as many lawyers know and some take advantage of to "argue" - frequently condensing complex claims and history in overly simplified and slanted advocacy. good judges see through it

sep 1, 2025, 11:52 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bskwitter.bsky.social @bskwitter.bsky.social

Can chatgpt write bullshit filing text? FASTER THAN YOU CAN SWIG DIET COKE

sep 1, 2025, 4:20 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Ed Walker @edwalker.bsky.social

Can't wait to see the evidence the lawyers relied on in making that statement of fact. Rule 11 is gonna get a workout on this case.

sep 1, 2025, 8:10 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Steven Armstrong @bevatrondrummer.bsky.social

😂

sep 1, 2025, 4:24 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Bill Stewart @billstewart.bsky.social

Elon's whole "super apps" argument is wrong - web browsers are already the super app, and can do most of the things individual apps get created/marketed for; LLM apps don't have any new superpowers here. And Grok, easily persuaded to be racist and Nazi, is not better than ChatGPT.

sep 1, 2025, 4:43 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Nihl L'Amas @nih-llamas.bsky.social

Video thumbnail
sep 2, 2025, 4:15 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Zac @oshimia.bsky.social

I'd love to see their definition of "think". I'm sure it'd be a doozy

sep 1, 2025, 4:16 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Liz Dye @lizdye.bsky.social

Mecha Hitler has thoughts on user safety

OpenAI Shifts From Benefitting Humanity To Putting Profit Over Safety 42. The blockbuster success of ChatGPT seduced OpenAI into taking actions at odds with its altruistic beginnings. When OpenAI first applied for tax-exempt status in 2016, it stated that it would “be a nonprofit corporation organized exclusively for charitable and/or educational purposes”; that “the specific purpose of this corporation is to provide funding for research, development and distribution of technology related to artificial intelligence”; and that “[t]he corporation is not organized for the private gain of any person.” It also promised that “OpenAI does not plan to play any role in developing commercial products or equipment.” 43. OpenAI’s philanthropic ideals lasted only three years. Lured by the size of the AI startup investment pie (which by 2019 totaled $40.4 billion globally), OpenAI announced on March 11, 2019 the formation of OpenAI LP, a for-profit entity that would ostensibly help “raise investment capital and attract employees” by promising its investors “a capped return” of “100x their investment”—a cap that OpenAI buried in the text of the announcement.
sep 1, 2025, 4:15 pm • 39 3 • view
avatar
debrecenisrac46.bsky.social @debrecenisrac46.bsky.social

Does this mean you are the one who does the blue highlights? Your work is treasure

sep 1, 2025, 6:06 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Koehn @noonan66.bsky.social

We should start all of this with the Three Rules of Robotics.

sep 1, 2025, 6:14 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Koehn @noonan66.bsky.social

Asimov wrote science fiction. Britannica writes irony.

image
sep 1, 2025, 6:51 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
ladiaz.bsky.social @ladiaz.bsky.social

everybody's dt jr impression...

sep 1, 2025, 4:47 pm • 0 0 • view