For sure, a lot of the replies seemed to think - ah this will make people get it, they'll see their hospital closed and regret their vote.
For sure, a lot of the replies seemed to think - ah this will make people get it, they'll see their hospital closed and regret their vote.
i think it's tactically defensible specifically because it will kill a ton of their old people, and also that leonid is kind of insane for nigh directly saying it
"killing five percent of rural old folks probably shifts the ballot line +4% at least" is both true and not especially productive to say so i'm a little miffed this conversation is still going tbh but i cannot control what bluesky fixates on
From my reading studies show between a 5 and 10 percent increase in Republican performance post hospital closures. You aren't making that up. You also lose the impact the medical staff have on the community.
attrition accumulates with time
Well I for one would like access to emergency medical care when traveling.
i would accept some lapse in this if the availability of medical care were permanent thereafter
I just don't think it works like that. I also think the rural urban divide is really not a strong corelate for voting trends. Education is a much much stronger predictor of support for Trump than rural / urban
they will blame it on Jewish space lasers before admitting they are wrong