Chise 🙏. Can you please repost liberated ( unlocked ) links. Half the ones I opened were locked , incl peer review and stat news. (Did you know The Daily Mail bought New Scientist ? It shows) "80% produced antibodies ...
Chise 🙏. Can you please repost liberated ( unlocked ) links. Half the ones I opened were locked , incl peer review and stat news. (Did you know The Daily Mail bought New Scientist ? It shows) "80% produced antibodies ...
that lab tests show are capable of blocking infections" vague meaningless pr hype copy This is ad copy which implies it worked, yet is inconsistent or contradictory, with a phase 1 study. Probably DOES NOT ( ! !) mean the tests showed humans blocked infections. I wish.
I suspect it merely means "80% ( humans maybe ? ) produced ( bnabs* ) antibodies " * that lab tests show might block some infections. (If we can get the levels high enough, and enough cross strains. ) Maybe I'll read unlocked paper & be surprised. HIVEs for yrs? Oh no.doesn't sound fixable