Would you be interested in reading it? www.fcc.gov/document/edi...

He likes to cherry pick the words that support him while ignoring the rest of the words.

I noticed that.

No, it didn't. "A full spectrum of content" was never a requirement. It didn't have to be remotely balanced. Maybe stop pretending to be an expert here....or even a novice. You're clowning yourself.

FD allowed the possibility of a full spectrum of content. That’s all …

“…allowed the possibility…” is not the same thing as requiring it.

Requiring time and space for other voices allows the possibility. Without that requirement, the audience will never have that possibility afforded them.

People choosing not to take advantage of an opportunity is not the same thing as not having the opportunity. You just don’t like the choices people are making.

You’re right. I don’t k ow how I ever even come across liberal views today. My TV and computer only get FoxNews. Quit moving the goalposts. You said what you said and we’re dead wrong.

I think though that yes, I’m sure I’d get up at 5 AM on Sundays to hear those diverse views though. I’m sure almost everyone would….and did.

You said "forces", not "allowed". You were wrong, and you don't know what you're talking about.