It's worse. His, er, rationale is: Deep Blue beats Kasparov and chatGPT works more like the human mind (according to him), ergo, chatGPT will be better at chess than Deep Blue. And not one exemple to back this up! It's really just faith in the hype (ie capitalism) for all these Yes Men...
Chatgpt is noticeably shit at chess
Oh cool, so he's just got no idea whatsoever how any of this actually works.
Like chatGPT, he communicates with extraordinary confidence to disguise his lack of actual intelligence 😅
He used “astonishingly” soooo many times
He initially bashes critics with the the "astonishing fact that" they don't use ChatGPT, and at the end admits he doesn't "have all that many useful things to say about the technology" and "[struggles] to identify the best people with whom to talk about these topics"
He's smart enough, he's just a gigantic liar and a fraud. (And a rapist.)
Wow! I didn't know that last part!
If you look through the thread there's a few articles people shared about the accusation against him.
I wonder which AI magnate lunatic dug Ol Franky out of the trash bin of history to print this crap lol
It's extremely sad because Chat GPT doesn't even look at a database of grandmaster's games... it looks at things people have written about chess. So it will tell you a move, sometimes ilegal, and tell you why it's good, even if it's terrible and not doing the thing it says.
I don't often play chess, but when I do, I don't make moves based on a "feeling". I do reason, see what moves are allowed, what my adversary could do after that. I'm quickly limited, but bet Kasparov does the same, only a lot lot better. So no, we do play more like Deep Blue than chatGPT.
I bet he thinks other people are stochastic parrots and he's the only person in the world who actually thinks.