and yes...at least one permit was granted to a large protest while at least one was denied to a large church. What is the implication I'm supposed to take from this? That there is a general or systematic bias for one or the other?
Replies
The implication you should take is that pandemic restrictions were essentially never enforced against protests but sometimes against churches, based on a observation of the protests that occurred, individual denials (like in DC), and written rules (like in California).
sep 9, 2025, 7:21 pm • 0 0 • view
I don't think it's worth talking further if you're going to circle back to false claims already addressed in this exact thread (re: CA).
sep 9, 2025, 7:26 pm • 0 0 • view
It's definitely not worth talking further if you're going to pretend that claims have been "addressed" when I'm still sitting on zero replies to citations to California state government guidance. bsky.app/profile/adis...
sep 9, 2025, 7:29 pm • 0 0 • view