Accountability and purity tests are different. You can hold someone accountable but if you torpedo the person that's potentially who stands between us and police state fascism, writing that person off because of a disagreement on a few issues is classic throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I understand your concern, but Newsom isn't being voted out for some time still, and you can both pressure him to continue the fight against authoritarianism *and* pressure him to take a better stance on supporting trans kids and helping the homeless.
european-security.com/the-cesspool...
I don't disagree. One can do both. But that's still not purity testing to me. That's accountability. With purism I'm talking about candidates or elected officials who are summarily dismissed outright because of a single stance, especially when them in place can move the needle to a better place.
The problem is selling that to people who A: are directly affected by the single issue, making their personal outcomes terrible either way, and B: have seen that issue be a canary in the coalmine for other issues and C: have never seen the needle move, no matter the compromise.
I've been trying to formulate a proper response here, but I don't think this is the right format for a discussion of this size and complexity. Simply put I think I understand your position, but in the end I disagree with some of your analysis and political strategy.
Which is your right. I appreciate your civility.
You support a bigot. End of discussion.
You have no idea what you’re letting yourself in for. Go ahead and die on the hill of purity. It will literally be the last thing you do
Gavin Newsom is dying on the hill of Transphobia. bsky.app/profile/park...
Do you know who votes for bigots, Liz? Bigots do. So have fun with your unearned confidence and your moronic condescension over there with the other bigots.
What if the single issue was “sending Race Bannon to a concentration camp”?
Is there any way to hold politicians accountable without being accused of torpedoing them? People (including Harris herself) accused uncommitted of being pro-Trump because uncommitted tried to hold politicians accountable for the genocide they were financing.