lmao if you think those are the only two options. Double lmao if you can't figure out that this place is filled with bloodless technocrats (complementary)
Replies
Yes, I absolutely believe that two options that numerically cannot generate a large enough coalition without alienating many, many voters we need in the current system are bad options. Thanks for asking.
aug 28, 2025, 1:09 pm • 0 0 • view
to be fair to this guy, he’s been confidently and consistently wrong about a lot of stuff so his being wrong about this is also on-brand
aug 27, 2025, 3:12 pm • 6 0 • view
It's just really obvious at this point who came here and put in a crumb of effort to curate an experience for themselves and their audience (if applicable) and those who chose to do something different
aug 27, 2025, 3:42 pm • 2 0 • view
It speaks to the decay of our wonk-pundits that nobody can conceive of a place full of policy nerds as anything beyond "blue-dog centrists"
aug 27, 2025, 3:06 pm • 70 3 • view
It’s important to remember that this guy is like 14 years old
aug 27, 2025, 3:07 pm • 0 0 • view
Anyway it's increasingly clear that this guy's a moron and not worth paying attention to.
aug 27, 2025, 3:07 pm • 50 0 • view
increasing from 100% clear to 110%
aug 27, 2025, 3:17 pm • 4 0 • view
Classic ettingermentum post tbh
aug 27, 2025, 3:18 pm • 2 0 • view
Isn’t he the one who’s like, a 19 yo Canadian?
aug 27, 2025, 3:46 pm • 0 0 • view
To be fair, most of the technocrats on here are only bloodless bc theyve completed their standard adenochrome infusion protocol.
aug 27, 2025, 3:25 pm • 0 0 • view
I view both those ideas about electoral politics as ways to sidestep the real world and rely completely on a priori ideology. Any good approach necessarily involves engaging with the electorate, not assuming there is one cool trick to always winning.
aug 27, 2025, 3:24 pm • 0 0 • view