Or, just hear me out, you could”d pick someone better first. Newsome isn’t the candidate. Why not pick someone who isn’t a bigotted piece of shit? You’ve got a couple of years. It’s a it early to be nailing your colours to the mast, no?

I dont pick the nominees. There is a voting process. If after that voting process, you have two shitty candidates to choose from, then choose the less shitty one. Its easy

That also applies in the primaries. Until he’s a Preidential candidate, he’s just another transphobic arsehole running for office. Why not pick someone who isn’t going to throw civil rights away? Is that really such a controversial thought?

Youre acting like im saying newsome should be the nominee. Im not. I would vote for him if he was. Because trump is obviously worse.

Take a look at the thread. That is exactly the position the comment you replied to was about. If that isn’t your position, why are you even arguing with me? Have a go at the Newsom-stans who want every critic to shut up.

Nowhere does anyone imply newsome should be the nominee. OP says "never newsome" folks are the same people who stupidly did not vote kamala in 24

Really? So, comparing people saying htey won’t vote for him to people who didn’t vote for Harris is what, exactly? What is the similarity? I mean, as no one’s suggesting he should be the nominee and all.

I dont know what you arent understanding. If he is the nominee, and trump is his opponent, you should vote for gavin. If you are "never gavin" that means you would not vote for him even against a trump 3rd term. Same as people not voting for harris against trump in a second term

Or, as I said, the Democrats could pick a non-pos candidate now that they’ve been warned that picking Newsom means they lose. Why are you blaming the people who won’t vote for him and not the Democrats for picking him, knowing enough of their core vote won’t vote for him to mean they lose?

2/ Especially as both options are theoretical and neither’s happened.