It wasn't a very nuanced position she took. You're adding nuance that isn't there
It wasn't a very nuanced position she took. You're adding nuance that isn't there
You honestly think that if you were to ask her "is activism against genocide bad?" That she would say "yes"? Really?
Of course she wouldn't. But it's bad to protest against the people actively aiding the genocide according to her, so there might be an issue here between how she would answer that hypothetical question and her actual position
So her actual position is to be against protests but she wouldn't admit this to seem like a good person. If that's the person you think she is who am I to try to convince you otherwise? It seems like you perfectly captured her character by reading one statement of her without nuance. Well done.
No, the actual problem is that her argument is sloppy, lacking nuance, and grounded in all sorts of unstated premises that I suspect she'd find untenable if she were forced to defend them. I think Breadtube is too niche a target for him, but Isaac Chotiner would have a field day with this post
You could easily have convinced me otherwise if you made sense and had good arguments
But I didn't, curious