They aren’t . They aren’t female. Women are female. They are women only to the extent of the suffix caviat.
They aren’t . They aren’t female. Women are female. They are women only to the extent of the suffix caviat.
Tell that to your dictionary. "a woman who was considered to be male at birth"
Correct, it doesn’t say ”a trans woman is a woman.” As it would have to do for your assertion to be true :)
Nope. It says a woman. "a woman who was considered..." If trans women aren't woman. The dictionary you used would have called trans women men.
You can’t cut parts out to fit your argument . ”Hitler was a socialist.” Becomes a true statement according to your logic, if one is allowed to cut out the national part.
You said trans women aren't women. Using a dictionary that said that a woman is "an adult human female." I said trans women are women. Using that same dictionary that said a trans woman is "a woman who was considered to be male at birth"
I'm not cutting parts out. You're excluding women who don't fit your world view.
Then say it verbatim : ”trans women are women who were considered male at birth .” It’s not the same as ”trans women are women.” It doesn’t work.
Verbatim from the Cambridge Dictionary. The same dictionary you used. "Transgender woman, a woman who was considered to be male at birth" The dictionary calls them women. It's not the same as "trans women are women." because it already said that a transgender woman is a woman.
They don’t call them women, you cut parts out. They call them women who was considered to be male a birth. Don’t misquote them to fit your narrative.
They do call them a woman though. It's in the sentence "a woman who was considered to be male at birth". You're ignoring 1/5 of the sentence to fit your own narrative. It'd say "a man who was considered to be male at birth" if trans women were men, but it doesn't.