avatar
Ari Berman @ariberman.bsky.social

"This case concerns whether the federal Constitution permits a state to alter the rules of an election after the fact and apply those changes retroactively to only a select group of voters," writes Judge Richard Myers, a Trump appointee. "The answer is no."

may 5, 2025, 11:03 pm β€’ 397 92

Replies

avatar
Mari βŒπŸ‘‘ @blueymom.bsky.social

πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³πŸ₯³

may 6, 2025, 12:40 am β€’ 1 1 β€’ view
avatar
E. Hatt-Swank @ehattswank.bsky.social

It’s about freaking time! Hopefully this will be the end of this travesty.

may 5, 2025, 11:22 pm β€’ 28 1 β€’ view
avatar
junkyardjoy3.bsky @junkyardjoy3.bsky.social

πŸ‘

may 6, 2025, 12:45 pm β€’ 0 0 β€’ view
avatar
Beth McClain @bethmcclain.bsky.social

Hallelujah

may 5, 2025, 11:19 pm β€’ 0 0 β€’ view
avatar
Truth&Grace @truthandgrace.bsky.social

THANK YOU Judge Myers! SHEESH.

may 6, 2025, 12:48 am β€’ 1 0 β€’ view
avatar
Haemaker @haemaker.hae.com

Art. I Sec 9: ...No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed...

may 5, 2025, 11:24 pm β€’ 4 0 β€’ view
avatar
tejanarusa @tejanarusa.bsky.social

Jeez, that seems so obvious.

may 6, 2025, 3:25 am β€’ 0 0 β€’ view