There is no evidence of there being a "Pro Hamas Group" within the NEA. That's the intellectually dishonest takeaway here. If the original post lacks a little bit of nuance/grammar could be improved, that's not intellectually dishonesty.
There is no evidence of there being a "Pro Hamas Group" within the NEA. That's the intellectually dishonest takeaway here. If the original post lacks a little bit of nuance/grammar could be improved, that's not intellectually dishonesty.
Glass houses etc
What does that even mean in this context? Are you trying to be clever, or just a snarky ass genocide apologist?
Just saying that if you are going to accuse other of intellectually dishonesty, you should be extra careful in precisely what you write. The ADL had obviously gone off the rails, but you shouldn't accuse them of things they don't say.
They're saying the only reason teachers don't want to use ADL materials is that they're pro-Hamas. It's right there.