avatar
Trish @thowze.bsky.social

No, actually he was against birth at all. He was an antinatalist. Which is pretty crazy in itself.

image
may 19, 2025, 2:20 pm • 3 2

Replies

avatar
oldandsharp.bsky.social @oldandsharp.bsky.social

This word came about in the past couple of years,but up to that time,they used Quakers as the example.Strict Quakers lived women/men apart, no children produced.The only problem...they died off.There are still people who claim they are Quakers,but not as strict as olden days.No original descendants.

may 19, 2025, 5:43 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Simple. Radical. Spiritual. @quakers.bsky.social

You are thinking of the Shakers, formally known as the United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing. They were a communal and celibate sect. As for Quakers and sex, I suggest watching: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Air0...

may 19, 2025, 8:16 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
oldandsharp.bsky.social @oldandsharp.bsky.social

When you hear about someone like this, the biggest question I have is "Your mother or father wanted you here, that's why you exist, what right do you have to decide for someone you have no relationship with?"

may 19, 2025, 2:32 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Trish @thowze.bsky.social

Except we don't get to ask him. I didn't even know this word until now...

may 19, 2025, 2:43 pm • 0 0 • view