avatar
Randall Munroe @xkcd.com

Wavefunction Collapse xkcd.com/3134/

4-panel Comic. (1) STUDENT: If the wavefunction only collapses when I observe it, does that mean my consciousness affects the universe? (2) [Bad:] PROFESSOR: Yes, quantum entanglement proves that we all have souls. (3) [Good:] PROFESSOR: No, consciousness plays no role here. It’s just physical measurement. (4) [Chaotic:] PROFESSOR: No. The wavefunction collapses when *I* look at it because I’m a full professor. It won’t collapse for an undergraduate.
aug 28, 2025, 9:27 pm • 3,418 518

Replies

avatar
Crazie Daizee @craziedaizee.bsky.social

or it both collapses and doesn't collapse observation just picks the path -you- are in, not the wave

aug 29, 2025, 12:29 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Bob @mistab0b.bsky.social

But how does the wave function know you're measuring, as opposed to just hanging around in the vicinity and being all entangled and the like?

aug 28, 2025, 10:02 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Sotuanduso Storm @sotuanduso.bsky.social

It's not the concept of measuring, it's the tools of measuring, like photons.

aug 28, 2025, 11:26 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Falrinn @falrinn.bsky.social

It's the reason why Schrodinger's Cat is an intentionally nonsensical scenario. Under mainstream understandings of quantum mechanics, the radiation detector is itself a valid "observer" and therefore no cat superposition occurs (at least not within a single universe).

aug 28, 2025, 10:04 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
JBloodthorn @jbloodthorn.bsky.social

Bad Code: The tiles are generated randomly Good Code: The tiles are generated based on adjacency Vibe Code: The AI did it and we had the intern fix it manually

aug 28, 2025, 9:36 pm • 29 0 • view
avatar
KJHargan @khargan.bsky.social

Neutral: What’s a wave-function?

aug 28, 2025, 10:38 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Richard Wild @richardwild.bsky.social

If I measure it and write it down wrong, is the wavefunction still collapsed

aug 28, 2025, 10:32 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Anders Lanzén @lanzen.bsky.social

Yes, but you'd transfer to another multiverse according to the many worlds interpretation. Though you wouldn't notice

aug 29, 2025, 12:34 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Sam Pottle @dribrats.bsky.social

Well, it won't collapse *much*.

aug 29, 2025, 4:59 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
wgoulding.bsky.social @wgoulding.bsky.social

This one had me cackling 😂

aug 29, 2025, 5:21 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Merk @merk94.bsky.social

The Solipsist’s Counter: The wave function only collapses when I observe it because I am conscious and the rest of you are unthinking p-zombies.

aug 29, 2025, 5:53 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
lukewarm.bsky.social @lukewarm.bsky.social

ok, colloquial solipsism and waveform collapse involves travelling back in time Sure, the waveform only collapses when I measure it, but in the scenario where somebody else "measures" it and then tells me, it doesn't collapse until I hear it, which means it has to go back in time and collapse then

aug 29, 2025, 7:00 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Sunil S 🇺🇦 @sunils.bsky.social

I am going to start using the last one.

aug 28, 2025, 9:51 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Anders Lanzén @lanzen.bsky.social

Neutral: these are three equally controversial interpretations right there (ok, maybe the third is either more or less equal, depending on interpretation).

aug 29, 2025, 12:36 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Louis C A @bosslca.bsky.social

People who live in Wavefunctions shouldn’t throw Observations.

aug 28, 2025, 11:40 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
aroundight.bsky.social @aroundight.bsky.social

Does the cat observe whether or not it's dead?

aug 28, 2025, 9:36 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Heather 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 @impliedsalad.bsky.social

Yes and no.

aug 28, 2025, 10:41 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
whispertime.bsky.social @whispertime.bsky.social

bad and chaotic work well together. Professors have souls. Undergraduates don't.

aug 29, 2025, 3:30 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Damien Henry @damien-henry.bsky.social

According to Max Tegmark, author of "The Mathematical Universe," it is highly likely that the wave function never collapses. What we observe can largely be explained by "decoherence."

image
aug 29, 2025, 11:06 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Anders Lanzén @lanzen.bsky.social

That's not just him, Decoherence is a popular interpretation. One of the most modern ones

aug 29, 2025, 12:43 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Damien Henry @damien-henry.bsky.social

Yes. but as far as I know, decoherence don't explain everything, and the Copenhagen interpretation is not fully refutated yet.

sep 1, 2025, 11:01 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Robert Hill @vonotar.bsky.social

Surfing the wavefunction blindfolded

aug 28, 2025, 9:31 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
g @balladussy.bsky.social

Doesn't "observing it" mean shooting a proton at it? I read that once and haven't been able to find information either way on it, but it makes a lot more intuitive sense to me that would change the behavior of a wave rather than conscious awareness changing the behavior of the wave

aug 28, 2025, 10:12 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
~ aurora ~ @ripplesplash.bsky.social

It’s not really observation but interaction. The moment a wavefunction interacts with something it collapses. Not super accurate but it’s like you’re walking blindly, there’s a certain range of places you can be, but the moment you bump into a wall you know exactly where you are

aug 29, 2025, 1:27 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
OrangeC7 @orangec7.net

The way I've understood it is that it's called "observation" because the only way to truly "observe" anything anyways is for it to be interacted with

aug 29, 2025, 12:14 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Sotuanduso Storm @sotuanduso.bsky.social

Yeah, that's my understanding. As the comic says, it's physical measurement that does it. It doesn't matter if there's a mind or machine to know it.

aug 28, 2025, 11:21 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
Kelly @tealwaistcoat.bsky.social

I think the idea is that the particle and your mind are quantumly entangled, therefore one affects the other in ways we can’t measure now. (Layperson’s understanding, could be wrong.)

aug 28, 2025, 10:39 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Nine @ninefates.bsky.social

It more just means that a quantum waveform is inherently impossible to "know" with any certainty until you measure it. There's unfortunately no magical property, it's just an expression of our lack of knowledge

aug 29, 2025, 12:59 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
dylanpage19.bsky.social @dylanpage19.bsky.social

Wavefunction Collapse would be a great band name.

aug 28, 2025, 9:37 pm • 8 0 • view
avatar
Rena Kunisaki 🇨🇦 @segment6.net

Well it would and it wouldn't. There's no way to be sure until you try.

aug 28, 2025, 10:51 pm • 15 0 • view
avatar
Ethan Vishniac 🇺🇦🇨🇦🇺🇸 @ethan-vishniac.bsky.social

I can't be the only one who thinks that the loss of unitarity in the presence of an event horizon is basically the same problem as wave function collapse. In fact, I think that must be the MWH position.

aug 29, 2025, 4:59 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Tom Forsyth @tomforsyth.bsky.social

This also forms the basis for my system of wizardry. A magic-user is someone who can choose exactly when and where (or if) a waveform is observed. Gandalf's just really good at keeping his eyes shut until the exact right moment.

aug 28, 2025, 9:46 pm • 13 0 • view
avatar
Anders Lanzén @lanzen.bsky.social

You've just that Neal Stephenson novel, haven't you? Or did you guys just get the same idea? 😉

aug 29, 2025, 12:32 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tom Forsyth @tomforsyth.bsky.social

I don't know the one you mean, so I guess I haven't, so probably just coincidence.

aug 29, 2025, 1:33 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Anders Lanzén @lanzen.bsky.social

I guess so. I don't want to reveal the title, to avoid spoilers. So I'll let it be a possible plot and not, simultaneously, in all of his books, the spoiler collapsing only until you read one and observe the story.

aug 29, 2025, 1:35 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Ricardo B�nffy @rbanffy.bsky.social

I explain it as "it collapses when the universe needs it evaluated". Reality does lazy computation whenever it can.

aug 28, 2025, 10:15 pm • 18 0 • view
avatar
Jon Hallin @jonhallin.bsky.social

Since I know almost nothing about quantum mechanics, I can say confidently that this is proof that we live in a simulation.

aug 28, 2025, 11:19 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
the15andthe45.bsky.social @the15andthe45.bsky.social

The hidden truth: it doesn't collapse, we just hone in on one part of it. Wait, that's not hidden, that's the many worlds theory. As you were.

aug 28, 2025, 9:37 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
羽帷_Yuvie @yuvie1215.bsky.social

your education level doesn't qualify you from collapsing the wavefunction

aug 29, 2025, 9:17 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Roberto Takata @rmtakata.bsky.social

Wavefunction prollapse is a bit more weird, I have heard that.

aug 28, 2025, 9:34 pm • 13 0 • view
avatar
Richard Laughlin @richardwlaughlin.com

Nice try. We all know it's actually just superdeterminism.

aug 28, 2025, 9:30 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
🧞‍♀️ 🇪🇺🏳️‍🌈 @myzsd.bsky.social

I think the WFC is simply a proof that nobody, not even the universe itself, truly understands statistics. I believe that if we ever do, then we'll be able to harness endless energy by the means of bistromathics.

aug 28, 2025, 10:02 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Andrei (Wordsmith of ¢5 words) - 🇦🇷 🧉 @ukrainian-aimhack.bsky.social

That or Douglas Adams was unintentionally right.

aug 28, 2025, 10:21 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mark Hathaway @markhathaway1.bsky.social

like a student collapsing under the scrutiny of anyone else

aug 29, 2025, 2:13 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Zemyla @zemyla.bsky.social

When the electron that's |up>+|down> passes through the detector, the latter's state becomes |detected up>+|detected down>. When you observe it, your state becomes |observed up>+|observed down>. And so on. There is no collapse.

aug 30, 2025, 3:51 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
艾米心amihart @amihart.foleosoft.com

okay then why do we observe either |detected up> or |detected down> if those don't even physically exist how do we see something that doesn't actually happen

aug 31, 2025, 7:08 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
readoutnoise.bsky.social @readoutnoise.bsky.social

I've had to talk several otherwise smart people down from the "quantum observation needs a conscious observer" ledge. Every second, around a quattuordecillion photon wavefunctions collapse inside the Sun, merely by interacting with other particles, unwitnessed by anything conscious.

aug 29, 2025, 11:36 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
艾米心amihart @amihart.foleosoft.com

"It's just measurement" isn't a good response either --> www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/sc...

aug 31, 2025, 7:06 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Steve with a Q @stevewithaq.bsky.social

Fellas, is your wavefunction prone to embarrassing collapse? Ask your doctor if Paulinol is right for you!

aug 28, 2025, 9:30 pm • 68 0 • view
avatar
Clint Eastwood Gacy @lukehaines85.bsky.social

I have a quantum penis, in that it both is and isn't erect. [Touches earpiece] ...Alright, no, I've been informed that I'm actually just in my forties...

aug 28, 2025, 9:51 pm • 34 0 • view
avatar
Decentralization Enthusiast @flow.blacksky.app

😂😅🥲

aug 28, 2025, 10:20 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
SuaSponte2024 @suasponte2023.bsky.social

It's wave-function prolapse that keeps me up at night.

aug 28, 2025, 10:14 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
mimocha @mimocha.bsky.social

Academia: Wave collapse is actually a physicist's metaphor for life, the infinite possibilities they once had, and the paths they could have taken - now all collapsed because they decided to take on a massive student loan to measure some funny waves in a lab.

aug 29, 2025, 3:54 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
blakealbion.bsky.social @blakealbion.bsky.social

It is always wrong to say there is a relationship between existence and perception. In any universe. It's wrong to say wave and particle cannot exist simultaneously. It's wrong to say matter and energy are distinct. The only thing that changes is the instrument we use to observe. Nothing else.

aug 28, 2025, 9:48 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
whomever1.bsky.social @whomever1.bsky.social

Did you succeed in collapsing the moral judgement waveform?

aug 28, 2025, 11:22 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
blakealbion.bsky.social @blakealbion.bsky.social

Just a little more penguin dust

aug 29, 2025, 12:01 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Dr. Martin Skrodzki @msmathcomp.bsky.social

Now, given there's good/bad, I feel I'm missing "neutral" as well as "lawful" answers to this to make a full D&D alignment chart 😅

aug 29, 2025, 6:35 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Anders Lanzén @lanzen.bsky.social

Neutral: those are three equally controversial interpretations Lawful good: stop it right there and now consider the Decoherence interpretation (wavefunction collapse is an illusion) and many worlds one (collapse is just the split to two new multiverse for all things "concious")

aug 29, 2025, 12:40 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Anders Lanzén @lanzen.bsky.social

Lawful evil: observance leading to wavefunction collapse is strictly forbidden an punishable by death except when done by our dear leader or high-ranking GOP members

aug 29, 2025, 12:40 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Conley Coleman @conleycoleman.bsky.social

cc: @seanmcarroll.bsky.social

aug 28, 2025, 10:20 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Matthew 🦖 @moosewithablanket.bsky.social

Wavefunctions just don't respect and fear me enough to collapse when I look at them 😞

aug 29, 2025, 12:09 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Prior Art Design @priorartdesign.bsky.social

I looked at a wavefunction and I collapsed

aug 29, 2025, 4:18 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Farm Dee @pharmesq.bsky.social

Oddly the waveform also collapses for high schoolers. It turns out what is important is thinking you know everything

aug 28, 2025, 9:54 pm • 26 0 • view
avatar
SidoenVT @sidoen.net

The fourth panel will turn out to be true with more research.... But only research by PhDs

aug 29, 2025, 3:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
xkcd title text @xkcd-titletext.bsky.social

Title text: "Wavefunction collapse is only one interpretation. Under some interpretations, graduate students also have souls." Alt text: https://explainxkcd.com/3134#Transcript

aug 28, 2025, 9:28 pm • 277 2 • view
avatar
aklugetx.bsky.social @aklugetx.bsky.social

I expected: "Wavefunction collapse is only one interpretation. Under some interpretations, graduate students also collapse."

aug 29, 2025, 1:35 am • 11 0 • view
avatar
Richie @webhackan.de

Breaking the waves, one dead cat at a time.

aug 28, 2025, 10:28 pm • 15 0 • view
avatar
Pip @ferret-express.bsky.social

refusing to participate in divergent timelines by rolling a d3, reading the matching panel, and ignoring everything else

aug 28, 2025, 10:43 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Ant @blueandmoreblue.bsky.social

The universe’s implementation does instantiate-on-load to avoid spending reality on unobserved wavefunctions.

aug 28, 2025, 11:38 pm • 1 0 • view