www.independent.co.uk/news/world/a... The article was originally written by the Washington Post, but it has a pay wall on the interview/article. www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/...
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/a... The article was originally written by the Washington Post, but it has a pay wall on the interview/article. www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/...
You claim the article is from WaPo, yet you include a link to a UK gossip rag.
Did you not see the WASHINGTON POST link in the post I sent you? Did you click on it?
Yes. And WaPo linked and quoted the same UK tabloid rag that you have. Which makes me question the validity of the entire thing.
I mean, would you accept as gospel truth a report from MSNBC if they copy a story from the National Inquirer?
As I stated, everything is pulled from the Washington Post exclusive interview (hence their pay wall). And with the way media heads are bending the knee to Trump, most aren't willing to air out the most random of bullshit out of fear of dystopian reprisals.