What absolute bollocks. If you want to go down this insane route, you'd be better off making a claim about pubic hair.
What absolute bollocks. If you want to go down this insane route, you'd be better off making a claim about pubic hair.
There’s more likely to be something in that than the tattoo thing. It’s better for men to be attracted to women who look like they’ve gone through puberty.
Puberty is usually over by the mid teens. It can start as early as 8 and be done by 12.
Right. So wanting a partner without pubic hair is considerably more concerning than wanting one without tattoos.
Whether it’s 8 year olds or 11 year olds it’s equally concerning to me.
We're talking about the comparison to wanting a partner without tattoos because it means they're under 18.
It depends on why doesn’t it?