avatar
Max Kennerly @maxkennerly.bsky.social

Kavanaugh's statements make the problem worse, not better. If the reason SCOTUS is using cryptic shadow docket orders is because "five" of them can't "reach a consensus or a compromise on a particular issue that might be difficult," then that order should not be precedential —there's no majority.

sep 4, 2025, 9:30 pm • 8,461 2,525

Replies

avatar
Wiscopinions @goodtrouble121234.bsky.social

Oh shut up Kavanaugh, you predator🤢

sep 5, 2025, 12:53 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Matt @mattferrel.bsky.social

Cool, so lower courts should just ignore shadow docket orders since they create no precedent

sep 4, 2025, 9:54 pm • 27 2 • view
avatar
The Ghost Of Sarra Copia Sullam @sarracopia.bsky.social

The shadow docket is unconstitutional.

sep 5, 2025, 1:01 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
m. hela fella @marguerite00.bsky.social

The drunkard frat boy needs to be disbarred. He lied during his interview & someone paid off his debt. Kavanaugh is compromised. trump is an illegitimate president due to his crimes/felonies & acting on behalf of 🇷🇺. All his decisions & appointments are illegitimate inc. Kavanaugh.

sep 5, 2025, 8:42 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Kennwick from X @kennwickman.bsky.social

Supreme Court is no longer Supreme.

sep 5, 2025, 2:07 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Idiokratie @idiokratie.bsky.social

www.politico.com/news/2025/04...

sep 4, 2025, 10:51 pm • 3 1 • view
avatar
The Devil's Advocate @thedevilsadvocate.bsky.social

SCOTUS rulings should not be 'cryptic', but given this array of assholes, what should we expect?

sep 5, 2025, 7:39 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
David L Hutchinson @dlh-cda.bsky.social

These guys were allowed to lie (perjury?) at their confirmation hearings, what could possibly go wrong.

sep 4, 2025, 10:05 pm • 8 0 • view
avatar
Betty Perry-Fingal @bettypf.bsky.social

Just wow!

sep 4, 2025, 11:59 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Eric Johnson @erictjohnson.bsky.social

"Consistency is a lot easier" Consistently cryptic

sep 4, 2025, 11:10 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Cricket's Ghost @mustang-919.bsky.social

Ummm.... Because you love Beer?

sep 5, 2025, 1:10 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Silly B Man @lawnerd.bsky.social

This is what happens when a court gets to pick what cases it hears. Brain gets flabby. District and circuit courts need to decide the issues presented to them.

sep 5, 2025, 12:22 pm • 1 1 • view
avatar
hoptimus @hoptimusprime.bsky.social

This is what happens when you put a drunken idiot on SCOTUS.

sep 5, 2025, 12:26 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Elizabeth A Woodside @gramzi.bsky.social

Kavenaugh was grossly unqualified at his nomination hearing. Is anyone surprised he doesn't understand the harm their extrajudicial rulings can do? Is Brent on the Epstein List too?

sep 5, 2025, 12:55 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Grace @equinox55.bsky.social

Master of BS.

sep 4, 2025, 10:01 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Eliana @otrodia.bsky.social

FUCK useless treasonous corrupt pendejo Kavanaugh! #SCOTUS www.motherjones.com/politics/201...

sep 4, 2025, 11:09 pm • 3 1 • view
avatar
Jokadhd @jokadhd.bsky.social

you dont need to follow orders from the supreme court now? lol

sep 4, 2025, 10:44 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
James @dorianjames.bsky.social

Our supreme court is an abject failure. The next president should do everything in their power to bring an end to this court.

sep 5, 2025, 1:48 am • 1 1 • view
avatar
lucygevy18.bsky.social @lucygevy18.bsky.social

Dumbest Supreme Court ever‼️ (Except the three women justices )

sep 5, 2025, 2:56 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Bearcat Catbear @bearcat-catbear.bsky.social

Exactly, and he damn well knows this. With an openly partisan and radical six-justice majority they *still* have to resort to this kind of chicanery to give Trump his wins? This is not stable and it cannot last.

sep 5, 2025, 1:56 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Bearcat Catbear @bearcat-catbear.bsky.social

They think they can dig their way out of the graves they've made for American jurisprudence once they achieve their goals. So everything can be principled and fair once all their enemies are dealt with. Justice (Christian, white). It's a stupid fantasy.

sep 5, 2025, 2:00 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
GenderQueeries 🇨🇦 @genderqueeries.ca

Appoint 6 catholics, get the inevitable.

sep 5, 2025, 12:01 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
blondbomber.bsky.social @blondbomber.bsky.social

Cowards.

sep 5, 2025, 12:22 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Martin @ampule2.bsky.social

When the Oval Office is occupied by a Democrat with a workable majority, the first item on the agenda must be TERM LIMITS or better yet EXPANSION so decisions represent the people not a faction. The US must have more consistency in Constitutional rulings if it is to survive and resist total anarchy

image
sep 4, 2025, 10:33 pm • 18 5 • view
avatar
Robert lost patriot @woe123.bsky.social

IMPARTIAL MY ASS, this SMELLS 👃💩, of TREASON considering the OATH 😇 they took. An extreme example must be made 🧨for those that have deliberatly forsaken their DUTY TO THE RULE OF LAW, which they SWORE to uphold!

sep 5, 2025, 1:01 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
H@l Inc@nd3nz@ @clintoon.bsky.social

Not “or,” but “both … and.”

sep 4, 2025, 11:49 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Martin @ampule2.bsky.social

I wish!

sep 4, 2025, 11:57 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
H@l Inc@nd3nz@ @clintoon.bsky.social

Me too … but I’m fully prepared for when Dem leadership tells me “we poll-tested it, and unfortunately this obviously good idea just isn’t popular enough in rural diners … but if you vote harder next time, who knows?”

sep 5, 2025, 12:05 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

Expand. Term limits would require an amendment. Expansion wouldnt

sep 5, 2025, 11:24 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Gerard MacDonell @gmacdonell.bsky.social

Don't disagree. But the idea that Roberts is "bipartisan" is itself a joke.

sep 5, 2025, 2:01 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Martin @ampule2.bsky.social

Better? 😉

image
sep 6, 2025, 12:20 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Paul B @newzealander1.bsky.social

Corrupt organization.

sep 5, 2025, 12:23 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kari Johnson @karijohn.bsky.social

Welp, hold my beer.

sep 4, 2025, 10:21 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jody Grinder @jodygrinder.bsky.social

Let's hear what one of Trump's employees has to say.

sep 5, 2025, 7:38 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
The_Lady_Red @theladyred.bsky.social

🎯🎯🎯

sep 5, 2025, 12:56 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Skyline @skyline4438.bsky.social

This really feels like an extension of the death of serious people in government. No one is really interested in doing the hard work, so they cut every corner possible to avoid it.

sep 4, 2025, 10:06 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Lucylu @lucylu8.bsky.social

Kavanaugh is a danger to America and an out and out wanker Never should have been confirmed - Never should have been a judge Not even a traffic court judge Just another GOP obliged to others & compromised

sep 5, 2025, 9:33 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
pastajoe.bsky.social @pastajoe.bsky.social

image
sep 5, 2025, 12:22 pm • 1 1 • view
avatar
Kirsten something or rather @leaferi.bsky.social

Yes. Agreed

sep 5, 2025, 10:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Frank Patrick @fpatrick.bsky.social

Isn't it their actual job to reach consensus or compromise? What are they doing there if they can't accomplish that?

sep 5, 2025, 1:09 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Matt Thompson @mvthomster.bsky.social

pretzel logic everywhere like the anti-trans bigots surprised when others accuse them of acting just like their own mythologized "big gov't" bogeyman

sep 4, 2025, 11:13 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Maggipie @maggipie.bsky.social

Some of these fuckers are probably on the list too you know.

sep 5, 2025, 8:55 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
midnightblue46.bsky.social @midnightblue46.bsky.social

📌

sep 4, 2025, 10:55 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Julia/Julie W Given @jjbluiz.bsky.social

Boo hoo hoo. The job is hard. We don’t always get it right. We can’t agree so we do nothing but sow confusion and hand the flaming shit bag back to the lower courts. And we have to do this for life. Hold my beer.

sep 5, 2025, 1:07 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
DelteilH @delteilh.bsky.social

They have opinions, not precedence or findings.

sep 4, 2025, 10:05 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Ned @thewesterhazys.bsky.social

Famous legal wisdom used when trying to decide what to door dash with a group and being unable to agree "What the Fuck! This is so annoying just like whatever man somebody order something. I'll have anything....Just not pizza!"

sep 4, 2025, 10:10 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
tealsunset.bsky.social @tealsunset.bsky.social

It sounds like they are voting with their prejudices and can’t conform that to actual constitutional law.

sep 5, 2025, 8:59 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Mapaiko @mapaiko.bsky.social

Just fucking admit you've got the end result all figured out - because fuck us you say what the constitution means now - and you've not yet figured out the tortured kafkaesque grotesquerie of "reasoning" you're gonna makeup to support your fascism. Fucking snotty little twatwaffle.

sep 5, 2025, 2:00 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mapaiko @mapaiko.bsky.social

They're playing Calvin Ball

sep 5, 2025, 1:56 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Pippin @rustyvonnail.bsky.social

When I was a youngster in school, I had the naive notion that Supreme Court Justices must all be very intelligent. This current crop of Justices has definitely enlightened me to my naivety.

sep 4, 2025, 10:29 pm • 43 2 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

Lockner were geniuses in comparison.

sep 5, 2025, 11:23 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Perkyshai @perkyshai.bsky.social

I mean…he raped a woman because he likes beer. Not really looking to him or justice gropes-a-lot for thoughtful philosophical reflection. I do wonder if Roberts is startled at the movement of the center in relation to fifteenth century British property law.

sep 5, 2025, 12:48 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
reggie seidman @ennui.org

Kava-ball

sep 4, 2025, 10:54 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
BlueSky394583820381041783 @mycatisfamous.bsky.social

image
sep 5, 2025, 4:49 am • 2 1 • view
avatar
Chris⚖️Justice @chrisjustice01.bsky.social

Corruption prefers ambiguity bsky.app/profile/chri...

sep 4, 2025, 9:46 pm • 74 27 • view
avatar
Mandla Ntuthuko @tchallaforever.bsky.social

This is what happens when you add a 2nd known rapist to the SCOTUS.

image
sep 4, 2025, 10:57 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
OzarkJack @ozarkjack.bsky.social

The Supreme Pedo on the Court

sep 5, 2025, 11:26 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jakob G. @jakobgamertsfelder.bsky.social

Religious nutters are never good to have in charge of anything.

sep 5, 2025, 1:27 pm • 11 1 • view
avatar
koenokatachi.bsky.social @koenokatachi.bsky.social

Roe is settled law, until I get confirmed anyway.

sep 5, 2025, 3:13 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
concernedguy.bsky.social @concernedguy.bsky.social

Off with all of them. So corrupt they need to accidentally fall out of the window.

sep 5, 2025, 12:51 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Michelle.cat @michelle-cat.bsky.social

Because they are fantasy

sep 5, 2025, 1:48 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
marysarkes.bsky.social @marysarkes.bsky.social

He should never have been confirmed.

sep 5, 2025, 12:55 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Wildly Maximalist Michael Weiss @profmweiss.bsky.social

image
sep 4, 2025, 10:09 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
silvermoonbeam.bsky.social @silvermoonbeam.bsky.social

He’s making those cat’s butt lips again

sep 5, 2025, 2:18 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Tim Satterwhite @timsatterwhite.bsky.social

He's an asshole, and that's all there is to it.

sep 5, 2025, 2:29 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Myandra keeps hoping. At least he can't cheat death. 86/47 @myandra.bsky.social

Corrupt to the core.

sep 5, 2025, 12:45 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
The Unity Center Of Cincinnati @unitycenter2018.bsky.social

Hello! We are The Unity Center Cincinnati, supporting families through peer support, education, and creating a friendly environment. Please help us spread positive energy by liking and following our account! 💙✨ #SupportFamilies #CommunityCare

sep 5, 2025, 4:16 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
FrancesSierra @francessierra.bsky.social

Given Brett Kavanaughs' less than stellar character placing any value on anything he says is somewhat useless.

sep 5, 2025, 12:34 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Tim Wilson @drhaskell.bsky.social

7 year term limit on unelected government appointments. It shouldn't end of life organ failure to open a spot .

sep 4, 2025, 10:06 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
N=1 @nequals1.bsky.social

I'd be fine with presidents just getting 2/term, and letting the total work itself out. Maybe you put a retirement age in there too.

sep 4, 2025, 10:59 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Tracy’s 🙄 @tflores.bsky.social

He’s full of it

sep 5, 2025, 3:42 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Chrisnl @chrisnl58.bsky.social

Kavanaugh is a POS ! End of.

sep 5, 2025, 2:28 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
luv1another2.bsky.social @luv1another2.bsky.social

SCOTUS is compromised blue states need 2 treat rulings that go outside of the constitution & laws need 2 B ignored, especially when it's obviously pay 2 play or favors.

sep 4, 2025, 9:55 pm • 3 1 • view
avatar
Valvefreak @valvefreak.bsky.social

Wasn’t he the rapist?

sep 4, 2025, 10:04 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Ozma @rowyourbot.bsky.social

Yes.

sep 4, 2025, 10:30 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
barbbatb.bsky.social @barbbatb.bsky.social

The Supreme Court has now become frightening

sep 5, 2025, 3:52 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
David Roche ☘️🇺🇦 @davidroche7.bsky.social

There is a reason he can’t spell his surname Kavanagh correctly….

sep 4, 2025, 11:05 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Precious Larue @preciouslarue.bsky.social

I wonder what the founders would think about the shadow docket. I'm pretty sure they would file it under "tyranny."

sep 5, 2025, 11:48 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

Ball, Sacks, and Schwartz, a lol corporation.

sep 5, 2025, 11:32 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Bev Stupek @nanabev14.bsky.social

Duh!!!! 🙄

sep 5, 2025, 12:04 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Chip @chips-gifs.com

chips-gifs.com

Video thumbnail
sep 5, 2025, 12:13 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jubilado0505🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 @jubilado251.bsky.social

They’re awfully defensive about their rock bottom approval rating. Richly deserved. That immunity decision was a disaster. The difference between Trump 1 and Trump 2 is that ruling. A career criminal was given a get-out-of-jail-forever card.

sep 5, 2025, 10:55 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
azul4u.bsky.social @azul4u.bsky.social

www.cnn.com/2021/07/22/p...

sep 5, 2025, 12:53 am • 4 2 • view
avatar
azul4u.bsky.social @azul4u.bsky.social

TRUMP hid 4000 TIPS and Complaints against KAVANAUGH from sexual assault victims before KAVANAUGH was appointed by Trump to the SUPREME COURT. In fact maybe that’s why they can’t release the EPSTEIN Files!

sep 5, 2025, 12:49 am • 3 1 • view
avatar
azul4u.bsky.social @azul4u.bsky.social

BULLSHIT! Why do they call it “”SHADOW DOCKET”???? Cuz they don’t want ANYTHING IN WRITING

sep 5, 2025, 12:44 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Thomas Serrano @docgforme.bsky.social

They did reach a consensus that their politics demanded a certain outcome. They just can’t agree on which stupid-sounding obviously contrived justification should be used.

sep 7, 2025, 3:42 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Doug Warren @dougwar40k.bsky.social

I just--it--you can't get mad because lower courts disregard your reasoning when you DIDN'T GIVE ANY REASONING! These people are crazynuts!

sep 5, 2025, 12:32 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

Only if you want to be able to say whatever.

sep 5, 2025, 11:30 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
cabanaboy.bsky.social @cabanaboy.bsky.social

Exactly 👍🏻

sep 4, 2025, 11:14 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Brian Guteking SZN @packrfan4.bsky.social

Is Brett Kavanaugh the dumbest SCOTUS Justice?

sep 5, 2025, 12:50 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Invictus Ghost @invictusghost.bsky.social

Kavanaugh would gladly share the view with the Senate to keep it from expanding the Court.

sep 4, 2025, 10:52 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Dane @peacedanish.bsky.social

No choice for lower courts than to follow the same standards as qualified immunity, I guess.

sep 4, 2025, 11:01 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Molotovsky @grifftheimpaler.bsky.social

sep 4, 2025, 10:09 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Ann Given @missgiven.bsky.social

What a tool.

sep 4, 2025, 11:09 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Spew Spewitt @spewspewitt.bsky.social

I know that in theory lifetime appointments are somehow meant to keep the judiciary independent across multiple administrations, but basically the Supreme Court has the final word on everything and it’s insane that they never face voters.

sep 5, 2025, 12:16 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Call me Al … @atnylinuxadmin.bsky.social

Theoretically, the idea is that Congress has to continually face the voters and Congress can impeach a Supreme Court justice the same way they can impeach a President or Vice President. The problem is that Congress has become totally ineffectual! 😡

sep 5, 2025, 1:02 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Spew Spewitt @spewspewitt.bsky.social

And impeachment is a sham. It’s never worked.

sep 5, 2025, 1:06 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
💙💚Bowie Maroney 💙💚 @baxie71.bsky.social

Bret Kavanaugh is just another Republican sexual abuser of women. They are all tiny dick rapists.

sep 5, 2025, 2:48 pm • 5 1 • view
avatar
Dawn❌👑Ocean Harmony🎶☀️🌴♿️ 🐕‍🦺🦮👩‍🦽🚶🏻‍♂️ @dawnoceanharmony.bsky.social

. 🚨We Need Mass Protests🚨 To Surround SCOTUS! They Need To Feel- We The PEOPLES’ Anger! 💪 For All Their Unconstitutional Rulings! .

image
sep 4, 2025, 10:20 pm • 9 3 • view
avatar
Clintonomor @clintonomor.bsky.social

Man those harbor freight megaphones are a class icon

sep 5, 2025, 12:00 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
xmrr.bsky.social @xmrr.bsky.social

Let’s face it: shadow docket orders are what conservative justices came up with to protect Trump while not setting precedents that may serve a dem president in the future. Kavanaugh just wants lower courts to decide pro-Trump, this is what he means by cases that fall “squarely” under shadow orders.

sep 5, 2025, 12:05 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
abdohassan.bsky.social @abdohassan.bsky.social

bsky.app/profile/abdo...

sep 5, 2025, 12:54 am • 1 1 • view
avatar
Hope Himars 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 🇬🇪 🇪🇺 🇨🇦 🇲🇽 🇩🇰 🇵🇦 🇬🇱 @hopehimars.bsky.social

United States Supreme Court CORRUPT AF

image
sep 5, 2025, 4:53 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
f150-93.bsky.social @f150-93.bsky.social

Not smart, for sure!

sep 5, 2025, 1:01 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
2CentNuisance @2centsnuisance.bsky.social

Listen, P.J., and Squi, and Handsy Hank, and Gang-Bang Greg all vouched for this guy

sep 5, 2025, 2:03 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Paul Elledge 🇺🇦 @pelledge.bsky.social

Partisan docket?

sep 5, 2025, 12:52 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Paul Elledge 🇺🇦 @pelledge.bsky.social

So should we start calling it the minority docket?

sep 5, 2025, 12:51 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Ed @ward920.bsky.social

Liar and a loser.

sep 4, 2025, 11:45 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Gathmore @gathmore.bsky.social

I'm surprised he hasn't fallen down drunk on the job at least once so far.

sep 5, 2025, 6:39 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Auntie M1 @auntiem1.bsky.social

Preach i!

sep 6, 2025, 1:15 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
stlhd1000.bsky.social @stlhd1000.bsky.social

And it’s all horsesh-t …..they are doing what the Kochs/rw billionaires tell them to do..they don’t have their “own” opinions..need to only refer to them as the MAGA Kangaroos from here forward..or Chief Calvinball in Roberts case

sep 4, 2025, 11:55 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
jpa722.bsky.social @jpa722.bsky.social

I am not even sure the use of the shadow docket is permissible constitutionally nor that it is ethical. This demands an investigation by the US Senate and these statements should subject Kavanaugh to impeachment. This can in no way be construed as a term of good behavior"

sep 5, 2025, 12:52 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Robert Clyde @robertclyde.bsky.social

He likes beer!

sep 5, 2025, 5:45 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Contrarian4US @frankmale.bsky.social

Then the Supine Court shouldn't allow the disputed action to go forward. They should put it on hold until it gets resolved thru lower courts.

sep 5, 2025, 11:36 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Shea LaRoux @shealaroux.bsky.social

Or at least hold a hearing

sep 5, 2025, 11:54 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Hovercraft Full of Eels ❌👑 @hvrcrftfullofeels.bsky.social

it's beer, isn't it?

sep 5, 2025, 2:40 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kea @keatiki.bsky.social

Martine Aubry, a French politician, former minister, former mayor of the City of Lille, once said : "Quand c'est flou, c'est qu'il y a un loup." Freely translated : "When things are unclear, there's something fishy going on."

image
sep 5, 2025, 8:08 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
DrMary @drshowup.bsky.social

Fucktose Indeed

image
sep 5, 2025, 12:28 am • 3 1 • view
avatar
jives11.bsky.social @jives11.bsky.social

Anyone expecting anything decent from that whack job needs their head read.

sep 5, 2025, 1:24 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
experimental22.bsky.social @experimental22.bsky.social

The Roberts Court is a national catastrophe. It has facilitated the destruction of the US Constitution and the American Republic. Intentionally so.

sep 4, 2025, 10:28 pm • 44 8 • view
avatar
Mathew Strack @gs-badger.bsky.social

management passing off its work to the underlings— relatable. but also worse! demanding the legal authority of a signed opinion without doing the work of getting to consensus among its own members! shady AF

sep 4, 2025, 10:00 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
snartkety @snartkety.bsky.social

Fresh horrors in the news every day.

sep 5, 2025, 9:47 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Denverite @berg8311.bsky.social

Seriously, so how about letting the district courts sort it based on existing precedent until the cases are developed enough to be ripe for SCOTUS review

sep 5, 2025, 12:19 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
pamnapo.bsky.social @pamnapo.bsky.social

Kavanaugh is terrible at his job.

sep 5, 2025, 1:14 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Ojodio @ojodio.bsky.social

He doesn’t deserve his job

sep 4, 2025, 10:34 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
rbsnst.bsky.social @rbsnst.bsky.social

WE ARE IN DEEP DO DO DO

sep 4, 2025, 10:08 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
rbsnst.bsky.social @rbsnst.bsky.social

THESE SO CALLED PROFESSIONALS CANNOT COME TOGETHER TO SOLVE A PROBLEM…….

sep 4, 2025, 10:07 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
dslovejoy.bsky.social @dslovejoy.bsky.social

Their way of ignoring their oath of office and the constitution for the federalist society and trump.

sep 5, 2025, 1:13 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Adam Richardson @ajrichar.bsky.social

More fundamentally, it's an explicit admission that the right-wingers on the court are making no effort to do law.

sep 4, 2025, 10:16 pm • 130 11 • view
avatar
The Big Friendly Giant B.F.G @bfg008.bsky.social

Yes, all 6 should be impeached and removed if we had a functional congress.

sep 4, 2025, 11:38 pm • 37 0 • view
avatar
Chrisby @chrisbyc.bsky.social

They should be understandable and reasonable and precedential and always in mind for the people. It's why you, SC, are there. For US!! Us. For better lives here in America. NOT R W crap for kkk, white supremacy and racism.

sep 5, 2025, 3:21 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
🇺🇦🇨🇦Vieux Quelque Chose @vieuxquelquechose.bsky.social

Investigate his money. He's bought. We know it.

sep 4, 2025, 10:47 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
jfxryan.bsky.social @jfxryan.bsky.social

It is truly the "Less Than Mediocre Court" now

sep 5, 2025, 2:03 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
siestacoffeegirl.bsky.social @siestacoffeegirl.bsky.social

The issues are only ‘difficult’ because they can’t follow the law and enact Trump’s agenda at the same time.

sep 5, 2025, 3:16 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
jessi1234.bsky.social @jessi1234.bsky.social

image
sep 5, 2025, 5:21 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Padraig2112 @isomorphism.net

It's like THEIR ONLY JOB

sep 4, 2025, 10:24 pm • 11 0 • view
avatar
JaxBBax @jaxbbax.bsky.social

That they are shady is more believable.

sep 5, 2025, 1:07 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Bluefolk ☕️📻📝🌏 @bluefolk.bsky.social

About the only thing Cavanagh is useful for is demonstrating how utterly incompetent frat boy rapist appointments are.

sep 8, 2025, 4:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
flyfella.bsky.social @flyfella.bsky.social

Kavanaugh’s a predatory boozebag with all the legal knowledge of a sack of shite.

sep 4, 2025, 10:42 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Tony Cowen @timbertoad.bsky.social

image
sep 4, 2025, 11:49 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
E Pluribus Unum @outofmanyone.bsky.social

Seems like they are sending coded messages to lower courts on how to achieve an outcome

sep 4, 2025, 11:32 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Mike Schwartz @itsmikeschwartz.bsky.social

Now that certainly sounds exactly like Judicial Activism.

sep 4, 2025, 10:24 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Mike in Montana @mikeinmt.bsky.social

The only good thing about this court's behavior is that it will guarantee the next Dem president will pack the court to neuter these corrupt idiots.

sep 4, 2025, 11:10 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Mike in Montana @mikeinmt.bsky.social

It's amazing people this disconnected from reality get to these high positions.

sep 4, 2025, 11:07 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
🇧 🇴 🇧 🇧 🇮 🇳 🇵 🇴 🇳 🇾 🇹 🇦 🇮 🇱 @bobbinponytail.bsky.social

It’s called corruption and that’s neither good nor legal, Brett. I’m sure you know that. Dig deep. It’ll come back to you…maybe.

sep 6, 2025, 2:38 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
cb-2025.bsky.social @cb-2025.bsky.social

SCOTUS is acting in partisan response. Shame on them.

sep 4, 2025, 11:19 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
mimmothteaparty.bsky.social @mimmothteaparty.bsky.social

📌

sep 7, 2025, 5:28 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
k1ng-rat.bsky.social @k1ng-rat.bsky.social

SCROTUS - tRump’s personal attorneys.

sep 5, 2025, 12:50 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Steph Aubertin @stephaub.bsky.social

He is the dumbest of the dumb. I don't for one minute believe he did the work or passed all of his exams to become a lawyer. People like him pull down the whole law profession. Embarrassing!

sep 5, 2025, 1:13 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Xergg @xergg.bsky.social

There is so much that is so deeply wrong with the united states that one does wonder if it will still be a nation in 3.5 years.

sep 4, 2025, 11:15 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
hoptimus @hoptimusprime.bsky.social

we go live to Brett

sep 4, 2025, 10:06 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
jacob @archbyjacob.bsky.social

hmm seems like something oral arguments and written decisions with legal reasoning might be able to help solve

sep 5, 2025, 1:34 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
counterrotate @jtlesq.bsky.social

He’s actually throwing the Chief Justice under the bus because it’s John Roberts’ job to form majority consensus. He’s saying because Roberts sucks at his job they are forced to use the shadow docket!

sep 4, 2025, 10:01 pm • 25 2 • view
avatar
headhuntnyc.bsky.social @headhuntnyc.bsky.social

Truth can hurt

sep 5, 2025, 12:59 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
LadyJ @ladyj11qt.bsky.social

Anything deemed to be objective, like the SCOTUS is supposed to be, should never be cryptic. If it is then it holds little to no weight in the balance of justice.

sep 5, 2025, 12:54 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Skiz70 @skiz70.bsky.social

SCOTUS … 6 of them … are scared or grifting trolls; they do back door licking his “ring” …. After hours . Their will be smothered with excrement in history FOREVER. Their family names are NOW STAINED WITH MANURE.

sep 5, 2025, 4:07 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Robert Houghwout Jackson @houghwoutjacksom.bsky.social

You’re misquoting him. He did not say that the short and cryptic orders are because they “CAN’T”reach a consensus, he is saying the short and cryptic orders reflect the consensus (though minimal) that they reached. That makes them precedent.

sep 5, 2025, 9:24 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Robert Houghwout Jackson @houghwoutjacksom.bsky.social

Every Supreme Court opinion reflects the consensus reached by the justices in the majority. Some opinions reflect greater consensus than others, but they are all precedent nonetheless.

sep 5, 2025, 9:25 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Robert Houghwout Jackson @houghwoutjacksom.bsky.social

Here is what he actually said: “It’s possible we screwed up, very possible, we’re human. But it’s also possible, and oftentimes is the case, that it’s the product of nine of us, or at least five of us, trying to reach a consensus or a compromise on a particular issue that might be difficult.”

sep 5, 2025, 9:25 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Robert Houghwout Jackson @houghwoutjacksom.bsky.social

Which is not what you said he said.

sep 5, 2025, 9:26 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Fearless Freddy @mymystery.bsky.social

There needs to be a purge.

sep 5, 2025, 1:04 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
PNW mom @iluvvinny1.bsky.social

That's just BS. You can't shame lower courts for not following rulings if your rulings are cryptic or ambivalent.

sep 5, 2025, 3:19 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Ryan Godfrey @ryangodfrey.com

Literally how could it be precedential?

sep 4, 2025, 9:42 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Snowcat @llamasshouldberevered.com

His defense is: "our work is hard"? Given what we know about him that makes sense.

sep 4, 2025, 10:03 pm • 6 1 • view
avatar
Friendly Skeleton @jonathan.eylerwerve.com

So, uh, that's a procedural coup by a minority of justices?

sep 4, 2025, 9:51 pm • 50 3 • view
avatar
Andrew Robbins @robbinsa.me

With the willing assent of a fifth, but yeah.

sep 4, 2025, 10:51 pm • 24 1 • view
avatar
SkiSkinnySkis @skiskinnyskis.bsky.social

Basically there is a majority to lick Trump's balls, but they can't figure exactly out how or how to justify their worthless ass kissing.

sep 5, 2025, 1:27 am • 20 1 • view
avatar
Andrew Robbins @robbinsa.me

nor do they care to

sep 5, 2025, 1:28 am • 7 1 • view
avatar
imjustagirl.bsky.social @imjustagirl.bsky.social

Weasel.

sep 5, 2025, 1:08 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
SuperPac @superpacs.bsky.social

He's literally just describing plurality decisions, why is this so hard for them to just admit

sep 4, 2025, 10:37 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

Because plurality definitions arent judical review and they want to have it both ways

sep 5, 2025, 11:31 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Mama Gin @mamagin.bsky.social

Do other parents let their kids do sleepovers with his kids at his house? I always wonder what happens to these kids when they’re old enough to realize that dad’s a predator.

sep 5, 2025, 5:21 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
beefunwellington.bsky.social @beefunwellington.bsky.social

It’s the Red Court. The Supremes left the building a while back.

sep 4, 2025, 11:02 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

Diana Ross weeps

sep 5, 2025, 11:33 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Comerado @dogsinautumn.bsky.social

Expand the court to 51, make each state a circuit court, make every justice ride circuit, then strip constitutional review from them.

sep 5, 2025, 2:54 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Turgid Jacobian @turgidjacobian.bsky.social

I cannot believe he's saying this.😬

sep 4, 2025, 9:42 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
LifeOfRiley215 @lifeofriley215.bsky.social

Is he drunk?

sep 4, 2025, 10:20 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Pattycakes88 @pattycakes88.bsky.social

Probably safer bet to ask if he’s sober.

sep 4, 2025, 10:28 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Steve Alkire @sea008.bsky.social

As a lawyer, I believe any "unprecedential" order is, in fact, precedent. It's what the court actually did in a given case. A court should not be able to avoid responsibility for what they do by simply labeling their actions.

sep 4, 2025, 10:16 pm • 9 0 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

Isnt the whole point to inform future jurisprudence and align with the Constitution? What point is the law if it is arbitrary except to be a star chamber. These people make the Lockner Court look like the Warren Court.

sep 5, 2025, 11:27 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Little old jake @6jsfam.bsky.social

Kavanaugh is a disgrace to his judicial robes.

sep 5, 2025, 8:57 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
fatimap72.bsky.social @fatimap72.bsky.social

😡😡

sep 5, 2025, 4:45 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
tkgriffith.bsky.social @tkgriffith.bsky.social

No mystery why they can’t reach consensus — the decisions are nonsense!

sep 4, 2025, 10:55 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
thomas-mcgeorge.bsky.social @thomas-mcgeorge.bsky.social

This sounds like they are saying “no” but are afraid to say it. Why are they afraid?

sep 5, 2025, 12:19 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
See Tiger Learn @skypulse.bsky.social

“…protect the Constitution…” Oh that’s rich coming from him.

sep 5, 2025, 3:30 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
EtherealSpirit @etherialspirit.bsky.social

image
sep 5, 2025, 1:58 am • 15 1 • view
avatar
Erica (she/her) 🇵🇸🏳️‍⚧️⚧️ @transnormative.bsky.social

How are the lower courts supposed to make sense of a "decision" like that?

sep 5, 2025, 4:27 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
gmaterry.bsky.social @gmaterry.bsky.social

Evil talking about evil😏

sep 5, 2025, 1:00 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Cath RN, PhD @headdoc35.bsky.social

sep 4, 2025, 10:11 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Molly Fisher @fisher-studio.com

Do they not have to have all justices present for these rulings? I didn’t realize that. Jeez even my puny dem club needs a quorum to change our dinky bylaws please tell me I jumped to an incorrect conclusion here

sep 4, 2025, 9:33 pm • 13 1 • view
avatar
Sotek @sotekprime.bsky.social

They need quorum. The thing is, the shadow docket only requires them to agree on an outcome, not on a reason - but precedent requires reasoning! so they can say "in this specific case, this specific outcome happens" by 5 of them voting, but if they can't say why...there's no precedent.

sep 4, 2025, 10:14 pm • 23 4 • view
avatar
Molly Fisher @fisher-studio.com

Thank you! I wish I could edit my comment since I was wrong. I think I should delete it, but I dunno if your answer will go away too. I learned something. I don’t want others to miss out.

sep 5, 2025, 1:00 am • 7 0 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

Its the whole point of review: to inform future jurisprudience.

sep 5, 2025, 11:25 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
David J Williams @djw1974.bsky.social

This punk (along with his sidekick punk, Gorsuch) criticized a federal district court judge appointed by Reagan for not complying with a shadow docket order. What a fraud.

sep 5, 2025, 12:18 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
It’s BlumanVT @blumanvt.bsky.social

Calvinball-ass Court

sep 5, 2025, 12:02 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
RainCityBunnies @raincitybunnies.bsky.social

Justice I-Like-Beer should have stuck to drinking beer

sep 5, 2025, 9:14 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
coleen @comaraster.bsky.social

He’s the dumbest Justice

sep 4, 2025, 9:54 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mary Beth Schneider @marybschneider.bsky.social

Oh, give Thomas some consideration.

sep 4, 2025, 9:55 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
coleen @comaraster.bsky.social

Nope - he’s worked out his angle & made coin. This idiot had his mom & dad pay off his credit card debt when he was on the DC Circuit & he was baby teeth

sep 4, 2025, 9:57 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Kiki @sju08.bsky.social

The six right-wing justices at the Supreme Court can only be described as unserious, corrupt, unethical, dishonest, compromised and partisan.

sep 5, 2025, 12:50 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
ellensirius.bsky.social @ellensirius.bsky.social

we know who he is never trust a sexual assaulter

sep 5, 2025, 1:23 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
mnbeamj.bsky.social @mnbeamj.bsky.social

Literally being ruled by a minority

sep 5, 2025, 1:46 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Connor Lynch @connorlynch.bsky.social

"they can't agree on much, but they do agree trump wins and the liberals are wrong" is *a* principle

sep 4, 2025, 10:04 pm • 77 3 • view
avatar
jeanbaudrillard.bsky.social @jeanbaudrillard.bsky.social

turns out that line was in the original constitution

sep 5, 2025, 1:51 am • 11 0 • view
avatar
Kim @kim65.bsky.social

If you squint

sep 5, 2025, 3:54 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
jeanbaudrillard.bsky.social @jeanbaudrillard.bsky.social

If you have 100k and wanna buy Clarence Thomas an RV

sep 5, 2025, 7:57 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

*shit

sep 5, 2025, 11:22 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
davidkc.bsky.social @davidkc.bsky.social

Damn just damn.

sep 4, 2025, 9:32 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Robi @robi-cedilnik.bsky.social

image
sep 5, 2025, 5:37 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
The Pale Wyrm @thegreatwroggi.bsky.social

Easy for a predator like him to justify looming in the shadows.

sep 5, 2025, 5:50 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dylan Batten @dylanbatten.bsky.social

It probably seems cryptic when you're impaired.

sep 4, 2025, 10:33 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
lexatoz @lexatoz.bsky.social

Serve beer. Can’t hurt; might help.

sep 4, 2025, 9:34 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
pamballard3.bsky.social @pamballard3.bsky.social

The reason they do the shadow dockets is because the really don't want the American people to know the real reason for their unconstitutional ruling. The ruling is kept in the shadows, so the conservatives don't have to tell us how they are screwing us all over for the dump regime.

sep 4, 2025, 11:45 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Billie Jo McAllister☮️😽🍄🎨🎼💙🪭☯️ @thedirtylowdown.bsky.social

Justice Kavanaugh is a rapist

sep 4, 2025, 10:12 pm • 4 1 • view
avatar
Adrian (GreenPower) @eversollae.bsky.social

Brett Kavanaugh is a Trump moron!

sep 5, 2025, 1:23 pm • 3 1 • view
avatar
@myrna-lee-1959@blsky.com @myrna-lee-59.bsky.social

SO very TRUMP, when he was selected by Trump, the FBI was told to cancel background check on him. NO NEED.

sep 5, 2025, 1:26 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Give War A Chance @houfek.bsky.social

sep 5, 2025, 12:25 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
방탄항상⁷💜🐳 @always4bangtan.bsky.social

Wow..

sep 5, 2025, 6:53 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Scot @scotty63.bsky.social

Incompetent

sep 4, 2025, 11:20 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Ergofoxxxy @ergofoxxxy.bsky.social

Should not exist. Nothing like the supreme court should exist as a trusted check in power or as an independent authority

sep 5, 2025, 1:35 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
redhardino.bsky.social @redhardino.bsky.social

Cause he's an incoherent drunk?

sep 4, 2025, 10:02 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
handlestohandless.bsky.social @handlestohandless.bsky.social

Yeah, well, AT SCOTUS: we NEED a supreme court, not a belly itcher.

sep 4, 2025, 9:42 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Donnie L @dr-4-freedom.bsky.social

Always good when a rapist judge wants to give his unqualified opinion

sep 4, 2025, 10:56 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Sean Eric Fagan @kithrup.bsky.social

ie, "We all agree the fascist should be able to kill these people, but we can't agree on the particular *precedents* that allow it, so fuck 'em."

sep 4, 2025, 9:32 pm • 75 2 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

Nor are we inclined to inform later jurisprudence.

sep 5, 2025, 11:23 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Sean Eric Fagan @kithrup.bsky.social

They have constructed things such that they, and they alone, get to decide everything, facts and precedent be damned.

sep 5, 2025, 11:24 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Eugene Hetzel @eugenehetzel.bsky.social

A star chamber, in other words.

sep 5, 2025, 11:29 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Evil Wizard, Esq. @evil-wizard-esq.bsky.social

You’re right - but I in no way expected Brett “I like beer” Kavanaugh to understand that nuanced of an issue.

sep 5, 2025, 12:50 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
jeanbaudrillard.bsky.social @jeanbaudrillard.bsky.social

'but i am objectively correct, therefore my opinion is the one that counts'

sep 5, 2025, 1:49 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
scottblah.bsky.social @scottblah.bsky.social

I hope the next Dem gets the opportunity to expand them. Eliminate the filibuster if needed and add six new justices.

sep 5, 2025, 3:27 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
freedomseeder25.bsky.social @freedomseeder25.bsky.social

image
sep 5, 2025, 4:27 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Kim C @mimimama.cloud

He should never have been installed. He’s a predator, too.

sep 4, 2025, 10:49 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Kevin M. Randall @kmr-kevin.bsky.social

So basically, the majority knows what they want the outcome to be, but they can't come to agreement on what the legal basis is for that outcome. So much for the rule of *law*. SCOTUS is just basically co-king with Trump.

sep 5, 2025, 3:58 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
oldandslow.bsky.social @oldandslow.bsky.social

Do we yet know who cleared up all that debt of his? CCs and a mortgage, I thought. It’s hard to remember anything other than the whiny tone and his evasive answers to the cross examination of him and his morals before being given one of the most influential jobs in the country. What a terrible man.

sep 5, 2025, 10:50 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
malinois4me.bsky.social @malinois4me.bsky.social

That, and he likes beer.

sep 5, 2025, 1:19 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Dean Y. @californiabuds.bsky.social

Forty-five years ago, term limits should have been in place.

sep 4, 2025, 10:31 pm • 3 1 • view