Looking like you're trying to get out of jury duty is a good way to get picked for a jury. It's a Catch-22: by attempting that, you have revealed yourself to be sane and rational, and thus a generally good pick.
Looking like you're trying to get out of jury duty is a good way to get picked for a jury. It's a Catch-22: by attempting that, you have revealed yourself to be sane and rational, and thus a generally good pick.
I was told in grad school to insist on being called doctor lastname as being the ticket out, unless you're in for a very technical case.
I can do that and when they ask me what my doctorate is in I'll just say, oh I just like to be called that
My experience on the jury side was that things you would think would get you struck don’t, also. Like, I admitted to not liking or trusting cops during voir dire in a case with police testimony. I was still selected.
I will note, fastest way off a jury is to be an artist at a drug trial. The prosecutor asked a wtf leading question, judge started yelling at a mid sixties age woman if she knew she could be fair for 10 minutes when her answer was "I think so?"
Conversely, if you look like you're REALLY trying to get on the jury-- and especially if you say so out loud-- both sides know you're nuts and will get you out of there as soon as possible.
Stating I will believe a woman who gets on the stand and says she was raped got me out of jury duty ... Which makes me think I should've kept my mouth shut and stayed on the jury
Shout out to the guy at Manhattan Jury Duty wearing a pot leaf “Legalize it” t-shirt and jeans in 2012. I hope you enjoyed your time on a jury.
I'm pretty sure I was relieved from jury duty by looking like I was paying too much attention.
Yeah, the one time I made it to voir dire, they asked if we had any questions. I raised my hand and asked, in complete honesty, "If you're alleging that he hit her, why are you charging him with assault and not battery?" (Yay for one undergrad business law class 😅) I was excused pretty quickly. 🤷♂️
Wait your undergrad business law class covered the difference between assault and battery? What kind is business law was this?
It was an example of how facts can greatly affect the outcome (e.g., assault without battery, but also battery without assault, like jumping out from a bush with a bat behind somebody who doesn't see it coming). Teachers gotta teach in a way that engages their audience, and it made sense in context.
You took biz law from Stringer Bell?
I can’t wait to serve on the jury and dole out justice
Being either a physician or an attorney is fairly decent protection against being picked. Being both is the golden ticket out the door.
This guy rules.
Absolutely
Idk, Alice Coltrane fuckin owns. 10/10, would pick this guy. Lid for every pot, etc
No, but I'll keep him there for an hour asking for music recommendations.
Haha great point
I got out by knowing what subrogation is. Read up on insurance lingo, friends.
I was excluded almost immediately after answering "Not necessarily, no" to "Do you put more confidence in a statement of fact when it comes from a law enforcement officer?"
I did take a course in healthcare law a long time ago 💡
I took two semesters of con law, but they did not care. It was my years as a management consultant that got me out of spending 2+ weeks of my one wild and precious life deciding which rich insurance company should pay for mold damage.
Tell them you want to be on a jury because you can tell if someone is guilty just by looking at them. Prosecution won’t want you because you can’t be swayed by facts. Defense can’t take the chance you won’t like the defendant. This was the advice given by a judge after moot court.
Fastest way though, IMO is to admit to knowing what jury nullification is 😂