They just had an entire list in the LA times about a month ago… books that were deemed by school boards to be sexually inappropriate for kids. The bigger issue is the progressives can’t answer simple questions about sexualized content & trans and it’s gonna keep them from getting elected.
Also worth noting: many of these same groups defending book bans are backing people convicted of harming children. That says everything about their real priorities — it’s not about safety, it’s about controlling ideas.
The fact that you can’t actually name a book proves my point. These bans aren’t about “protecting kids,” they’re about outsiders trying to control what other people’s kids can read.
You still haven’t listed a specific book or passage-you just keep pointing vaguely to “a list.” School board bans often come from political pressure, not expert review. Outsiders push their agenda into districts where they don’t even have kids enrolled.That’s not protecting children,it’s censorship.
bsky.app/profile/lind...
I’ll ck it out.