avatar
Robyn @robynrocks75 @robynrocks75.bsky.social

Ah I see. It’s not about GC belief it’s the law. So if it is single sex women only (for the purposes that are legitimate & proportionate)then yes it’s women only. No men or trans identifying men.

jun 12, 2025, 5:33 pm • 5 0

Replies

avatar
Laura Ramo @flog61.bsky.social

Legally speaking, Article 8 applies to trans people, despite Falkner’s comments.

jun 12, 2025, 6:57 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
purpleelectric.bsky.social @purpleelectric.bsky.social

So you are dictating to them. Under what law are you saying that a private group that chooses to admit cis women and trans women can't describe itself as single sex? How does the EA PREVENT a private group from describing itself however it chooses? Who would have a right to challenge, on what basis?

jun 12, 2025, 5:38 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Robyn @robynrocks75 @robynrocks75.bsky.social

Under the Equality Act 2010, a grp that chooses 2 admit women & trans identifying men - it can’t describe itself as single sex. call itself anything else - mixed sex, for everyone. It can prevent as they are legally defined terms. So eg women wld have right 2 challenge - breach of Act.

jun 12, 2025, 5:50 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
purpleelectric.bsky.social @purpleelectric.bsky.social

What section of the Act would be breached? What would be the cause of action for any woman challenging it? What loss or detriment would they have suffered?

jun 12, 2025, 5:53 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Robyn @robynrocks75 @robynrocks75.bsky.social

I’ve posted rather than replied the judgement. My poor tech skills

jun 12, 2025, 5:58 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
purpleelectric.bsky.social @purpleelectric.bsky.social

Or to put it another way, if a private group admitting both cis and trans women describes itself as single sex, precisely what section of what Act have they breached?

jun 12, 2025, 5:40 pm • 3 0 • view