Ah I see. It’s not about GC belief it’s the law. So if it is single sex women only (for the purposes that are legitimate & proportionate)then yes it’s women only. No men or trans identifying men.
Ah I see. It’s not about GC belief it’s the law. So if it is single sex women only (for the purposes that are legitimate & proportionate)then yes it’s women only. No men or trans identifying men.
Legally speaking, Article 8 applies to trans people, despite Falkner’s comments.
So you are dictating to them. Under what law are you saying that a private group that chooses to admit cis women and trans women can't describe itself as single sex? How does the EA PREVENT a private group from describing itself however it chooses? Who would have a right to challenge, on what basis?
Under the Equality Act 2010, a grp that chooses 2 admit women & trans identifying men - it can’t describe itself as single sex. call itself anything else - mixed sex, for everyone. It can prevent as they are legally defined terms. So eg women wld have right 2 challenge - breach of Act.
What section of the Act would be breached? What would be the cause of action for any woman challenging it? What loss or detriment would they have suffered?
I’ve posted rather than replied the judgement. My poor tech skills
Or to put it another way, if a private group admitting both cis and trans women describes itself as single sex, precisely what section of what Act have they breached?