I didn’t take that from her evidence - the judgement makes clear than the rights of trans people through the protected category of gender reassignment remain.
Replies
The problem is that the SC is operating under the mistaken apprehension that trans liberation and women's liberation are incompatible, and is restricting trans people's behaviour accordingly. This is unrelated to trans people belonging to a protected category.
jun 12, 2025, 8:18 pm • 1 0 • view
The SC is not mistaken, it’s clear. gender reassignment & sex r protected characteristics (pc). In some situations rights have 2 b balanced & protected eg membership orgs- u can't have one on basis of two non-overlapping pc’s ie membership is contingent on being female OR trans-identifying male.
jun 12, 2025, 8:52 pm • 0 0 • view
It can be clear and mistaken. And it is! It's predicated on a conflict of rights that doesn't exist.
jun 12, 2025, 8:54 pm • 0 0 • view