Since you have reading comprehension problems: 1. you said that libs will never rehabilitate Trump because he’s a rapist and pedophile. 2. I simply pointed out that’s not such a red line for libs given that the same applies to Bill Clinton and libs still like him.
And I agree! But it appears you’re defending Trump with whataboutery. So I don’t have any reading comprehension, I just cannot agree with your logic. You claim to not like any of your past presidents but your actions and words are a defence of Trump.
Ok so you’re just a fucking idiot then. Do I need to explain it to you like you’re 5 years old that nothing I have said was defending Trump
Like I’m 5? Jesus fella, you think I can vote in your elections despite telling you many different ways that I’m English. Tis you who is the idiot! Now tell me how you will vote in our elections as you think it’s so easy to vote in another country’s elections. Really looking forward to this! 😂👍
So you’re clearly determined to not read anything I’ve said so I think we’re done here. Also I made no mention of you voting or thinking you can vote in US elections, so yeah definitely a fucking idiot. Try actually reading before reacting first
Someone else was ruling him up doing that. It was pretty funny. Obviously he cannot differentiate between accounts responding to him.
*riling him up