No. I gave you a link to an AI rebuttal of yur cited 'proof'. How about having the courage to read it and risk learning?
Replies
So you're saying the word Wikipedia was not in the photo I sent you
aug 30, 2025, 2:49 pm • 0 0 • view
Can you perhsp ask an adult friend to explain my comments to you, if you have one. Manwhile, get a grownup to hold you hand when you find the courage to follow the link to the AI analysis of your proclaimed 'proof', I gave you that link to. Here it is again: drive.google.com/file/d/1s2bt...
aug 30, 2025, 7:43 pm • 0 0 • view
Bro I already read this Also answer the question
aug 31, 2025, 3:24 am • 0 0 • view
That's that way - prvaicate for several days then claim you've answered the question - a dishonest tactic straight out of the Christain Apologists Handbook amzn.to/461FplU
sep 1, 2025, 10:08 pm • 0 0 • view
I didn't claim to answer a question since you didn't ask one I claimed to have read the article you sent Then I asked you a question, that you have successfully dodged for about 3 days now. Dodging questions, common atheist tactic
sep 2, 2025, 1:16 am • 0 0 • view
Ah! You don't claim to have answered the question you claimed to have answered. Can you get any more desperate in your emrbarrassing attempt to divert attention away from your dishonest claim that the 'shroud' had been proved to be from 1st C. Palesting and not Medieval French creation?
sep 2, 2025, 10:45 pm • 1 0 • view
What?
sep 3, 2025, 2:54 am • 0 0 • view
And now the traditional excuse of being too stupid to follow the thread, eh? You've obviouly studied the Christian Apologists Handbook amzn.to/4p6gfeK
sep 3, 2025, 11:08 am • 0 0 • view
lacking so much logic/reasoning that you blame your opponent for incohereant statements. straight out of the atheist apologist playbook
sep 3, 2025, 7:14 pm • 0 0 • view
Keep that smokescree going. Maybe no one will notice how you tried to get away wit false witnessing and got called on it, and now you're runnign scared of the simple provenance question. Jesus needs all the lying, cowardly hypocrits he can get.
sep 5, 2025, 6:47 pm • 0 0 • view
So now you've found to courage to read it, do you still stick by the refuted claim that your cited paper proved the 'shroud' wasn't an early mediavel product? If so, why, what was wrong with the AI analysis, other than not agreeing with you? Or do you need to deflect and prevaricate some more?
aug 31, 2025, 3:08 pm • 0 0 • view