That's good in theory, but not very good in practice. A general strike also takes away from those striking. One-day strikes mean nothing aside from "they protested." Folks tend to stock up before the strike and make up after the strike.
That's good in theory, but not very good in practice. A general strike also takes away from those striking. One-day strikes mean nothing aside from "they protested." Folks tend to stock up before the strike and make up after the strike.
For any kind of strike to work, it must be sustained over a length of time. The amount of time is much more than just one day. The Bud Light boycott is a classic case: A large number of folks stopped drinking Bud Light. In it's place they drank other beers also made by Anheuser-Bush.
Net effect for the company? Not much at all. Net effect for those that rightfully saw the strike as nonsense? A whole bunch of laughter.
General strikes are proven very effective against authoritarianism throughout history. You’re right. It will need to be sustained. Probably a rolling strike. That’s where proper preparation prevents poor performance. 😁 Strikes definitely work. It’s why corporations are scared of unions. 🫱🏼🫲🏾
Strikes absolutely work. I've seen them in action from all 3 sides: The consumer, the striker, the management. I just think call the one-day thing a protest. Calling it a strike elicits laughter from management.
Now, here's a delima we'll be seeing in real time: The United Farm Workers are talking about a strike. They, of all people, have a need to strike. The gotcha is that farm workers tend to live hand-to-mouth and can't afford prolonged periods without pay. I don't have the answers here.