Or, hear me out, people and organisations go with money and status because that indicates previous success in obtaining shared objectives. I don’t see this as The Great Betrayal of life.
Or, hear me out, people and organisations go with money and status because that indicates previous success in obtaining shared objectives. I don’t see this as The Great Betrayal of life.
This is called Prosperity Doctrine. The belief that people and organizations have money, so they deserve that money, because they have money. It's a self-fulfilling pattern of thought that disallows critical thinking about the extreme power imbalance between the rich and the poor.
This is part of living in a capitalist society that had astonishing success for vast swathes of people who are part of the electorate. You expect change from them?
No, I'm actually relying on the swathes that were left out. We are not free until we're all free.
You are complaining about people not following their self interest. You think *moral suasion* is the deciding factor in politics? In the Revolution? Hell no. Change usually comes from pain, not political parties.
I'm not actually complaining about that at all, I don't know what assumptions you've made.
I have a hard time getting Dem friends past "I just escaped poverty, I need to entrench before I lift anyone else" mindset. Nobody would understand better than them what helped, but they don't want to think about it anymore (and especially get mad if I mention luck was a part of their experience).