avatar
Andy’s Snarky Smize🫦 @snarkyandy.bsky.social

It’s a good idea but then it will leave blue states vulnerable to trumps attacks.

sep 2, 2025, 5:13 am • 0 0

Replies

avatar
altNOAA 🇺🇸 @altnoaa.bsky.social

The national guard provides no protection against the Federal Government because the POTUS can federalize them at any time. This is why states need a State Guard instead.

sep 2, 2025, 5:14 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
Andy’s Snarky Smize🫦 @snarkyandy.bsky.social

Good to know.

sep 2, 2025, 5:17 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
altNOAA 🇺🇸 @altnoaa.bsky.social

Towns/states once had militias and the Fed Gov created the Militia Act (there's a few revisions) that formed the national guard to replace. Militias were partly responsible to keep the Fed Gov in check... but obviously transforming them into a force the POTUS can just take over made that pointless.

sep 2, 2025, 5:19 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Andy’s Snarky Smize🫦 @snarkyandy.bsky.social

So blue states need state-run military to guard us against lunatic presidents. I hope Pritzker realizes this.

sep 2, 2025, 5:26 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
altNOAA 🇺🇸 @altnoaa.bsky.social

Yes, and they can legally do that. California and NY have State Guards. But, they're small, underequipped and under trained for tasks like these. That really needs to change. California has an economy twice that of Russia. There's no reason why they can't have a real military.

sep 2, 2025, 5:29 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
Andy’s Snarky Smize🫦 @snarkyandy.bsky.social

I really hope blue governors are reading your posts.

sep 2, 2025, 5:32 am • 2 0 • view