The idea that trans people, the centre of the current moral panic, 'cannot be challenged' is ridiculous and doesn't bear scrutiny
Replies
But you're arguing here that we treat a subset of males as being less likely than other males to be sex offenders. Why?
aug 5, 2025, 4:53 am • 5 1 • view
We don't say we should "treat them as less likely", you're awful at reading
aug 5, 2025, 12:05 pm • 0 0 • view
I don’t believe you’re arguing in good faith. What you’re arguing for creates the circumstance where this 👇🏻can (and clearly does) happen. In what universe is this not a problem?
aug 5, 2025, 12:12 pm • 1 0 • view
In what universe are feminist focusing on excluding trans women from women's prisons (when the already are), when most rapes come from the prison staff? In what universe does it serve equality and protect rape victims to say women can't rape, excluding actual rapes from the law?
aug 5, 2025, 12:19 pm • 1 0 • view
Also if you make up stuff, of course you have reasons not to believe me. But I can do that too, for all I know you eat kittens for breakfast too
aug 5, 2025, 12:21 pm • 0 0 • view
Thanks for confirming that for you, harm to girls just doesn’t count, compared to the importance of trans women getting what they want. As to making stuff up, full chapter and verse here (his 20+yr history, inc how he now says online he’s 20F, when he’s actually 47) reduxx.info/exclusive-co...
aug 5, 2025, 12:35 pm • 1 0 • view
I said that nowhere, you are making up that I am fine with hurting girls. So yes you are making things up, even just now. None of my arguments were in favour of that.
aug 5, 2025, 12:37 pm • 0 0 • view
No repeated child sex offender, whether cis man, cis woman, trans man, trans woman or non binary person, should have access to kids. You never saw me advocate the contrary.
aug 5, 2025, 12:39 pm • 0 0 • view
So to use your words, thanks for confirming that you're not here for a debate (which means you would be reading and paying attention to the words of the person in front of you, instead of making up things that weren't mentioned once), you're only here to antagonize everyone who disagrees with you
aug 5, 2025, 12:41 pm • 0 0 • view
I’m glad you’ve said that (even if you did initially accuse me of making it up). Unfortunately, changing name by saying they’re trans does give CSOs a free pass to escape the consequences of their past convictions - so they’ll keep doing it. What solution do you suggest?
aug 5, 2025, 12:47 pm • 0 0 • view
Yes I accused you of making up my opinion on the topic and I maintain it. No it doesn't. And changing name is not a trans only topic, do you suggest to forbid all name changing for everyone in the entire world no matter the reason?
aug 5, 2025, 12:50 pm • 0 0 • view
You’ve created this world, where any long-time child molester who says he’s now trans gets a free pass to carry on abusing. You clearly think this to be unimportant/just fine. But most sentient people don’t, y’know.
aug 5, 2025, 12:40 pm • 1 0 • view
No I did not. I did not create a world where a child offender can access children. You apparently believe a repeat child sex offender should access children if they happen to be a cis woman. I don't.
aug 5, 2025, 12:43 pm • 1 0 • view
By the way I still don't see what children have to do with the initial topic: rapes in prisons.
aug 5, 2025, 12:44 pm • 1 0 • view
This was the post that started this thread, about sexual offenders and protecting women. And I have work to do now, so feel free to find somebody else to have a go at… bsky.app/profile/barr...
aug 5, 2025, 12:56 pm • 0 0 • view
You are setting trans women up as ‘better’, less of a risk than other males. And that leads to problems, cf priests. If you can’t see that, then you are blind to anybody else’s issues other than the ones you care about. And that disqualifies you as a useful commentator, cos you just don’t care.
aug 4, 2025, 10:19 pm • 3 1 • view