The single most important thing to understand about digital futurism is this: When the digital future that Sam Altman ( or Elon, or Andreessen, etc) predicts fails to materialize, he doesn’t have to give the money back.
The single most important thing to understand about digital futurism is this: When the digital future that Sam Altman ( or Elon, or Andreessen, etc) predicts fails to materialize, he doesn’t have to give the money back.
Vaporware is always more expensive but that's the point with them
But the most impetus thing to understand is that why you said doesn’t matter about the money, it’s about the data.And selling it all to the highest bidding country.QEloon and Peter Thiel have been planning this for years thanks to qeloons Nazi father that taught him the US needed to be a technocracy
I’d argue that the single most important thing to realize is that it has reached takeoff. It is not going to be stopped. Whatever it produces we get. The future has already built itself, using us, and we don’t know what we’ve built.
Also, LPs and investors will still keep shoveling money to them all in the hopes that one of their ideas will hit pay dirt.
The LPs and investors can still make a killing, so long as they sell before the peak.
Information super highway replaced by the Ai monorail.
Elon 100% watched that episode and thought it was a genuinely good idea.
ELON: Well, my work here is done. BYSTANDER: But you didn't do anything! ELON: Didn't I? [smiles smugly, starts to beam up] CROWD: [grabs him and shakes him] No! You didn't!
Or stop pumping the next big thing that won’t happen with our money.
Even if they had to give it back, they wouldn't.
There is no digital futurism. How can you add on to ones and zeros? It's on or off.
see: neumann, adam
Games of hot potato.
I hope the digital future involves Sam Altmans skull as a soup bowl.
I like the way you express yourself! Maybe AI can print 3D models of Sam Altman's skull as a soup bowl. I know a few million ppl who'd buy it. Also good for potty training cos it's always full of shit.
The Sam Altmans Skull as a Soup Bowl Company has a market value of $124 Billion after this skeet. Amazing!
When you put it like that it makes it sound like they're all snake oil salesmen with no particular interest in the effectiveness (or even ethics) of their products beyond their ability to turn a profit.
But the point is they don't need to turn a profit, they just need the hype to endure so that people continue to throw money at them. It's not just around the corner, it's just around the bend.
I'm looking forward to you being on If Books Could Kill, you twitter account with a professorship
That was a good line in their latest episode!
I did skip the citation on that, didn't I? You should cc BlueSky admin about that.
"the more unfulfilled these technofutures go, the more pervasive and entrenched they become" onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...
Nor will they get blamed
*devastating.
There’s the idea that the markets hold these people accountable, but then you look at how the market punished Zuckerberg for wasting $40bn+ on the metaverse…
And they’ll be no payment for data centers’ massive overconsumption of electricity & water. They’re bootstrapped theory: AI is about to be regenerative (lie); when it is, it’ll be so smart it will find a solution to humans living on a planet toxic & poisonous to humans, Mars (sci-fi fiction).
what are you taking about it'll definitely happen in the next two to three years wait come back
Nor do his credentials get questioned
The Vegas tunnel that doesn’t work, Elon kept all that money, I assume!
There’s more to it, of course. But if you start from there, the entire history of the digital future makes a lot more sense.
Someone should really write a book about this.
Someone’s book about this should really get published already.
Dave, if you do not finish those edits by your editor’s deadline, I am putting you on like THREE award committees.
Oh that is a stone cold threat right there. < Shudders at the thought >
It’ll work. That’s for sure.
I will find a way to appoint you in PERPETUITY, Dave. That means forever.
Some day, between now and eternity, I might learn how to say “no” to service requests.
I just finished reading Aldous Huxley's 'Brave New World' again. Add that to what Marx predicted (class division etc), sprinkle with 'It Can't Happen Here' (S Lewis), 'Lord of the Flies' (W Golding), and maybe 2001 Space Odyssey (AC Clarke), add Davenport's eugenics' theory, and you have TESCREAL.
Rule of Aquisition 259: Never be afraid to mislabel a product. Rule of Aquisition 1: Once you have their money, never give it back.
I'd be happy if going forward, every reporter asks the famously wrong tech bro, "But you predicted [X hyperbolic bullshit] last time and [Y total opposite outcome] happened, so why should we believe you about [Z new hyperbolic bullshit]?" But that rarely happens.
I believe Musk is supposed to be on Mars by now. And Altman keeps saying the next ChatGPT model will rock your shit, then walking it back. Unserious people making serious problems
Cos that requires tracking info. Figuring out they're fed tons of BS. And the reporter risks not being invited near tech bros. Reporters are famously missing brains and guts when it comes to ppl in power. Tech bros intimidate many. When they are actually selfish, greedy, SOBs out for fame + fortune.
Just Googling "[tech bro] predicts" (just that) usually yields up a treasure trove of meretricious fuckery and flimflam.
Oh I gotta remember to use these words: "treasure trove of meretricious fuckery and flimflam." I haven't found a better description of AI anywhere. Perfectly describes AI bubble that even Altman admits is happening. Any one word can be very useful. Thanks for the laugh. And that's no flimflam.
LOL Altman's jazz hands bullshit can't even survive scrutiny for more than two months. He said this right before (another) disastrous ChatGPT update.
These days, if they were asked that question more than three times by the same news outlet, they’d just buy the whole place and change the editorial strategy.
That is the most cynical and true thing I’ve heard today.
In spirit, yeah. But what definitely will happen is the interview-ee will make his annoyed views known to your boss' boss' boss' boss and it will find its way back down to you. Best of all, if it happened to you in the past, you just know not to ask.
I don't have much of an answer for this. No one can yell at the boss of ProPublica and expect anything. Or the Onion, I suppose. It's hard to yell at the boss of the hyper-local paper we have here. Probably not worth the trouble. But that doesn't help everything else.
I like that you said when
I dream of a future progressive administration jailing all of these fucks for furthering the world's ruination....