2. Greene's bill is the latest effort by Republican lawmakers to exclude millions of people living in the states without U.S. citizenship from census counts that the 14th Amendment says must include the "whole number of persons in each state"
2. Greene's bill is the latest effort by Republican lawmakers to exclude millions of people living in the states without U.S. citizenship from census counts that the 14th Amendment says must include the "whole number of persons in each state"
3. The Constitution has required a census every 10 years since the first U.S. count in 1790 to reapportion House seats among the states. It's not clear whether the results of a census in 2025 or 2026 (assuming it could be carried out in time) could be used for reapportionment, as I reported in 2020:
4. Under current federal law, the results of a mid-decade census "shall not be used for apportionment." Greene’s bill is a bid to reset the census schedule so that once-a-decade counting starts whenever the bill is enacted in 2025 or 2026, and “mid-decade” counting would take place in 2030 or 2031
Laws are for losers.....amirite?
5. Putting the legal questions aside, Greene's bill also raises a lot of practical questions. The Census Bureau is in the middle of a more-than-10-year process for #2030Census preparations, which includes research efforts such as the "2026 Census Test," while dealing with funding uncertainty
6. "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state..." - 14th Amendment on who should be counted in census apportionment counts used to redistribute U.S. House seats and Electoral College votes
7. The 14th Amendment's "Indians not taxed" clause no longer excluded some Indigenous people from congressional apportionment counts by 1940, when the Census Bureau began trying to include all Indigenous residents of the United States. From Carol Lujan: www.census.gov/library/work...
8. By the way, data from the census citizenship question that Greene's bill would require could allow state/local governments to draw voting districts that don't account for children and noncitizens, a radical departure from current standard redistricting. Its legality is an open question at SCOTUS