That would only be true had she not lied under oath. I specifically pointed that out.

Plus, you’re using the either/or fallacy. Everything she says must be false. Grownups know better.

The grown-up position is to weigh her credibility against evidence, not blindly accept her word as the “simplest” answer.

And again, if she were implicating Trump, you’d accept every word.

By your own logic, this is deflection then. 🙄 do you just not know how to defend your position? Cause you suck ass at it so far. bsky.app/profile/demi...

And by your own logic, you just confirmed my point…

lol how?

lol why…

You know you don’t have an argument. Move along now.

If I don’t have an argument, what are you doing here?

This just sounds to me like, had she said trumps name, you’d likely NOT believe her and I imagine for the same reasons I don’t.

Good defection there…

It would’ve been, had it been the only response I made. You’re wrong again 😩

Wrong. I don’t trust lying child predators like you apparently do.

That’s not an either/or fallacy on my part. I never claimed everything Maxwell says must be false. My point is that invoking Occam’s Razor to default to her truthfulness doesn’t work, because her history of lying makes that assumption less parsimonious, not more.