I’m not going to argue with you about that *at all*. Her actions are vile. Her attitudes are disgusting. I’m taking issue with the wider statement: we are not free and we are not equal.
I’m not going to argue with you about that *at all*. Her actions are vile. Her attitudes are disgusting. I’m taking issue with the wider statement: we are not free and we are not equal.
I'm confused then. I'm not sure what wider statement you are referring to that implies women are equal and free. I pointed out that Nancy Mace is a woman, and therefore oppressed by the patriarchy. And that she is white, so she benefits from white supremacy. These two things coexist in injustice.
I wasn’t disagreeing with you, which is possibly where the confusion has come in? Complicity and collaboration with oppressive systems is something we see a lot of, and it’s often a survival tactic. In Nancy Mace’s case, I very much doubt it is. Also, she’s awful.
Ok, that's fair enough.