avatar
lhuggs.bsky.social @lhuggs.bsky.social

Thanks. I didn't know how to say it.

aug 24, 2025, 6:56 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Crowbot @crowbot22043.bsky.social

I’ve been treading lightly with these trolls because I attracted a swarm of them the other day which I wasted many hours on. Which is okay but on day two I had to throw in the towel.

aug 24, 2025, 11:20 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

Did it ever occur to you that you might be mistaken, that your supposed antagonists aren't trolls? That their ideas and criticisms of the party might be accurate? That your rejection of their criticisms is motivated more by the rote of ideology rather than by introspection and critical thought?

aug 24, 2025, 11:36 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Crowbot @crowbot22043.bsky.social

No it wasn’t like that really. You see I’m Canadian and my interest is in seeing Trump stopped by a third impeachment before he turns his attention to annexing us. Those guys, and probably you want to deflect from the redistricting duel to an election in 3 years when that’s not important now.

aug 25, 2025, 12:05 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

Sorry you missed the boat. I want to see California, along with every other blue state, add as many more Democratic seats to the House as they are able. Why on earth would you believe I want to deflect from an issue that hasn't been mentioned in this thread?

aug 25, 2025, 12:12 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

Also, a third impeachment won't stop Trump unless the Senate votes to convict, which they steadfastly refused to do after the first two impeachments. What do you think would occur if Trump attempted to annex Canada? I do not think that would end well.

aug 25, 2025, 12:12 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Crowbot @crowbot22043.bsky.social

No but impeachment could sure put a stranglehold on his agenda. I don’t think it’ll end well either if Trump gets more aggressive and I don’t want to find out. He’s certainly ramping up his attacks on US cities. Not much is off the table.

aug 25, 2025, 12:56 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

I think impeachment without the certainty of conviction and removal from office would strengthen Trump's claims his policies and actions are legitimate. Of course the media would amplify those lies. Our best course of action is to cultivate overwhelming disapproval of Trump by the general public.

aug 25, 2025, 1:10 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Crowbot @crowbot22043.bsky.social

Not sure. That’s why I asked.

aug 25, 2025, 12:52 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
LordRobin @lordrobin------rm.bsky.social

I have no goddamn patience for these types. Trump is unleashing the fucking military on US cities and these guys want all our allies to pass purity tests. I half wonder if they’re Russian trolls. This is the kind of thing they like to do.

aug 24, 2025, 7:14 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

'Purity tests' are a device some Democrats employ to reconcile their favored candidate's profoundly immoral behavior, and to pressure others to abandon their principles and vote for that candidate. Why would you vote for a bigot, sexual predator or someone who is otherwise immoral and unprincipled?

aug 24, 2025, 8:11 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Crowbot @crowbot22043.bsky.social

What are you talking about here? This issue is about voting for a ballot measure to protect US democratic republic, not some cult figure like Trump.

aug 24, 2025, 11:12 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

I'm speaking about Newsom's viability as a candidate for the Democratic nomination, an idea several people have promoted. Also to jabber about 'purity tests'. Nobody I've replied to has mentioned the ballot issue. You're barking up the wrong tree.

aug 24, 2025, 11:27 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Crowbot @crowbot22043.bsky.social

I can’t see the blocked post now but aren’t you the one talking about an election that is 3 years away? While the main issue is having balanced maps next year for an election that Newsom has no part in. And so support for Newsom and California redistricting measures is not supporting a candidate.

aug 24, 2025, 11:35 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

I'm speaking to the people who are already 'nominating' Newsom, people barking about 'purity tests', and the wisdom of nominating morally deficient candidates for any office. Nobody in any of these threads has mentioned the redistricting measures.

aug 24, 2025, 11:44 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Crowbot @crowbot22043.bsky.social

I’ve mentioned the redistricting fight because talking about Newsom as an 028 nominee is premature and destructive to the redistricting issue that he’s leading, and the world can’t afford that now. Newsom isn’t passing any purity tests and who gives a shit anyway when the president is a criminal.

aug 25, 2025, 12:09 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

Whatever bud. I've clearly explained my positions. I'm done.

aug 25, 2025, 12:13 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Crowbot @crowbot22043.bsky.social

Thanks. I get a feeling that you’re genuine here.

aug 25, 2025, 12:57 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

Thank you very much. I'm glad we had the chance to clarify our opinions.

aug 25, 2025, 1:01 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
lhuggs.bsky.social @lhuggs.bsky.social

ADMIN PLEASE REMOVE THIS FAKE ACCOUNT PETER COLLINSON IS A TROLL ACCOUNT

aug 24, 2025, 8:13 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Peter Collinson @petercollinson.bsky.social

Don't forget to thank the Academy.

aug 24, 2025, 8:29 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
lhuggs.bsky.social @lhuggs.bsky.social

I think that's exactly what that was... it has been blocked! And, yah... how can anyone dance around and split hairs and pretend there's an intellectual arguement to be made about ANYTHING right now. Fascist tanks are in the streets of American cities. Hell no!!

aug 24, 2025, 7:26 pm • 1 0 • view