You previously framed your reluctance to do more than "sympathize" with "I don't think the trans vote is worth much" as though our rights and existence were dependent on population size. You also seem to find it justified that people want us dead for being rude, so pardon me for being uncharitable.
We've been nice and cordial in our fight for health care, equity, and basic human rights for years so please, oh magnificent one, excuse those of us who saw it gain us nothing so we switched rhetorical tactics.
Do you disagree that the trans vote is it's less than 900,000 total for the country? Do you think that any politician would consider that a "game changing" demographic? What I said is factual not defamatory or demeaning.
Again, you are framing whether or not we deserve basic human rights on population size, of which there are approximately 2.7+ million of us in the US. I find it as disgusting as saying, "babies can't vote, so we'll let 3 million die instead of literally doing anything."
You're putting words in my mouth and accusing me of things that I haven't said and haven't done so I think we're done here.
No, I'm rejecting the offensive framing you are using. Do vulnerable minorities deserve human rights or not? Do you think fighting for their rights is appropriate if only to prevent future escalation and the eradication of other minority groups? Have you read the "first they came for" poem?
Would you let the entire population of Kansas be stripped of human rights and health care and then be killed by the government because the population size is about the same as trans people.
“The trans vote” being based on the trans population is you implying that only trans people will vote in favor of protecting their own rights. The actual voting population is much larger than that bc some people actually care about and vote in favor of protecting others