Can you explain how you know these are White House sources and provide your evidence to support your claims. Thank you.
Can you explain how you know these are White House sources and provide your evidence to support your claims. Thank you.
Who else would be speaking on behalf of the DOJ to justify an FBI investigation? Are you really this dense? Were you just born today?
So, you have no evidence to back up your claims, you just resort to personal attacks. Stay classy.
Please take the time to learn a bit about how the world works before you jump into a thread to defend the NYT’s White House stenography, you pathetic dolt
On the contrary dear fellow, I am well learned. As is evidenced by the fact I can read an article, you cannot and I don’t make claims without evidence. Stop wasting my time with your evidence free claims and personal harassment.
Do you think this is an apolitical investigation motivated by the desire to find out if John Bolton mishandled classified information? Who do you think the NYT quoted anonymously to make that claim? Trying to understand the miraculous workings of your little brain
PS. Do you want a discussion? If you do, stop with the abuse. It’s pathetic, childish and evidence of a very weak minded person.
I don’t want a discussion, I think you’re a fool and it’s laughable that you would accuse someone of having a weak mind
Didn't take long for him to start the juvenile name calling, did it?
You’re right @kapitalradio.bsky.social was very quick to resort to as hominem attacks.
Im sorry the facts hurt your feelings.
It’s highly likely it is a politically motivated investigation based on the knowledge of Bolton being on Patel’s ‘enemies list’. I don’t know who their sources are, it could be two of many thousands of federal employees, many of whom remain apolitical and are in no way connected to the WH