avatar
AkivaMCohen @akivamcohen.bsky.social

The Constitution LITERALLY mentions news broadcasts, Joe. That's the whole "freedom of the press" thing

sep 16, 2025, 5:19 pm • 49 3

Replies

avatar
Shai Hulud 🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳 @sardarji.bsky.social

Joe must be an originalist (or whatever they're calling themselves now). TBF reading a newspaper aloud in the town square is not the same as a news broadcast, because we didn't have those at the time of the First Amendment.

sep 16, 2025, 5:45 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jim Teeth @drjamesjteeth.bsky.social

Is this why I was never given a printing press?

sep 16, 2025, 5:23 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Michael @mstevens86.bsky.social

People saying they will "dumb it down" for someone lead the league in dumbest shit said, period.

sep 16, 2025, 5:33 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
BeardlessMountainMan @capnrickysully.bsky.social

We probably need an exception for the tolerance paradox though.

sep 16, 2025, 5:22 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Marc Boorshtein @mlbiam.dev

Only a partially snarky question. Would this SCOTUS argue that because our founders didn't have TV broadcasts that they couldn't have meant news broadcasts as "freedom of the press"?

sep 16, 2025, 5:43 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Ken Wilson 👊🇺🇸🔥😉 @kcwilson.bsky.social

The founders had only muskets for firearms back then but the current court sees no issue with present day gun owners carrying semi-automatic weapons with high-capacity clips. I think publicly read broadsheets to TV broadcasts is pretty much the same sort of leap.

sep 16, 2025, 6:53 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
AkivaMCohen @akivamcohen.bsky.social

Much less of a leap, actually

sep 16, 2025, 7:23 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Elizabeth Le Fen @fenbeast.bsky.social

If you only accept print media as “the press” then the 2nd Amendment only applies to muzzle loaders, swords, and bayonets. 🤷🏻‍♀️

sep 16, 2025, 8:37 pm • 0 0 • view