I would have thought she’d tout her pet spot re-zoning in the stadium district as her primary housing accomplishment.
I would have thought she’d tout her pet spot re-zoning in the stadium district as her primary housing accomplishment.
A little harder to do that when it's tied up in two separate appeals.
But the rhetorical leaps seem easier to tie back to truthiness. “I am willing to do battle against entrenched interests to…” etc. The “get funds off the shelf” thing just has no legs?