Calling someone smug and self righteous for calling out the fact that you're choosing to contribute to a platform that is controlled by *literal* nazi is an even worse look imo 🧐
Calling someone smug and self righteous for calling out the fact that you're choosing to contribute to a platform that is controlled by *literal* nazi is an even worse look imo 🧐
“Choosing to contribute” on this platform or that is not why I used those words, and I think you know that
How else are we supposed to interpret your words? You seemed to take great offense to the implied statement that you're "part of a fascism machine" (aka you're still using, posting, replying, *contributing* to X) and in response you called Rich smug and self righteous. Am I missing something here?
Twitter is not a “fascist machine” jfc
bruh wake up www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-... www.wsws.org/en/articles/... www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2... www.disconnect.blog/p/elon-musk-... www.nbcnews.com/tech/interne...
Yeah I’m aware scum of the earth are on Twitter. I just choose to not interact with them
It's not that simple and it feels like you're intentionally ignoring that at this point. By contributing to X you: 1. Implicitly encourage your (large) following to stay on X 2. If you're following stays then even more ppl stay 3. This makes money for Elno via ads and keeps his influence very large
You might be able to safely ignore and see through bullshit nazi propaganda / fake news but it doesn't mean you're following is doing the same You have immense influence to rebuild the same community of ppl over here *AND* not contribute to maintaining the power and influence of a nazi/his platform