No, read the explanation carefully.
No, read the explanation carefully.
This is actually an excellent example of how an instruction to “show me your reasoning” doesn’t induce an LLM to produce the reasoning, just a plausible impression of reasoning.
Or the AI simply used nonexclusive bounds instead of inclusive.
If someone asked me how many years ago 2010 was, and I say 14.68, and they ask what I mean, and I say because that's how many year-units have passed since 12/31/24 - they would acknowledge that's technically correct but also that I'm a giant tool.
It says it didn’t. Google AI regularly gets things wrong. Didn’t you know?