avatar
emeraldcity @emeraldcity987.bsky.social

Are you new? 100% they would protect the Clintons.

jul 14, 2025, 6:05 pm • 3 0

Replies

avatar
NikkiP @nikkipearl.bsky.social

No one ever protected the Clintons. Did you miss the nonstop investigations, Congressional subpoenas, vitriol they were subjected to? Never a fan of either, but it's ludicrous to state they were "protected." I've never heard any Democrat say we should look the other way on sex crimes

jul 14, 2025, 6:10 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
emeraldcity @emeraldcity987.bsky.social

The party absolutely covered for Bill until it was impossible not to and the Clintons remained leaders of the party for years even after evidence of their corruption. Hillary was running for President while Epstein was in the news. Nothing was going to keep her from the anointed run. Don't be naive.

jul 14, 2025, 6:19 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
NikkiP @nikkipearl.bsky.social

I'm actually not naive. I was around for a lot of politically-driven, fact-free Clinton investigations. Again, I'm not defending them, or stating they're not corrupt (they're politicians, who are all corrupted by their profession), but they were investigated ad nauseum

jul 14, 2025, 6:27 pm • 0 0 • view