avatar
Jared (hard "d") @jaredhardd.bsky.social

It's Newsom. He has baggage that might keep him from the WH but he's certainly able to go toe-to-toe with Trump. Pritzker is also great, though not sure there's a big appetite in the party for a billionaire nepo baby.

jan 17, 2025, 4:30 pm • 4 0

Replies

avatar
John Castiglione @johncastiglione.bsky.social

Nope, not Newsom. Let's shut that guy down now. Doesn't have the juice, and hopelessly compromised.

jan 17, 2025, 4:32 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Jared (hard "d") @jaredhardd.bsky.social

Care to elaborate?

jan 17, 2025, 4:33 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bob barker 🍸 @insortediaboli.bsky.social

The Guilfoyle marriage is rife for ratfucking

jan 17, 2025, 4:44 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Jared (hard "d") @jaredhardd.bsky.social

I think she was a pretty normal person pre-2016, no? Regardless, as I said I'm unsure about his presidential prospects but he can certainly message well against Trump.

jan 17, 2025, 4:49 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bob barker 🍸 @insortediaboli.bsky.social

The populace is feral now, you need to give up a bit of the rationality

jan 17, 2025, 4:50 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Glonzo In Exile 🇵🇦🇬🇱🇨🇦🇲🇽🇺🇦 @no-obey-advance.bsky.social

Newsom doesn't have pride in taking on Trump. He has pride in the idea that people will like him if he *appears* to take on Trump.

jan 17, 2025, 5:45 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
John Castiglione @johncastiglione.bsky.social

Very well put

jan 17, 2025, 5:51 pm • 2 0 • view