avatar
Jared (hard "d") @jaredhardd.bsky.social

Maybe at the margins, but I think higher turnout and *way* less cost to taxpayers is well worth it.

jul 2, 2025, 3:42 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Ed Crotty (8647) @ejcrotty.bsky.social

"the savings would total approximately $42 million every two years..Although savings might be limited by the need to administer county-based judicial and district attorney elections in odd-years, such elections cost significantly less than those for municipal offices" 1/2

jul 2, 2025, 3:54 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Ed Crotty (8647) @ejcrotty.bsky.social

So it would require state law changes to get rid of odd-year elections to save anything. $42 million is $5 per person in NYC. MIT says $2 billion per year nationally for elections, but how much of this is fixed and how much much is variable?

jul 2, 2025, 4:08 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Ed Crotty (8647) @ejcrotty.bsky.social

Owning and storing the election equipment pretty much will cost the same whether it is used or not. Fulltime election staff is the same whether annually or bi-annually. Savings are the ballot printing and the temp workers - including elections judges - and I have been a judge for 4 years.

jul 2, 2025, 4:11 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Ed Crotty (8647) @ejcrotty.bsky.social

I agree with higher turnout. I'm not sure about the cost. I hope someone has studied this.

jul 2, 2025, 3:50 pm • 0 0 • view